Your assertion is only an assertion, as you admit you cannot prove it.
The recent lies have been exposed because we have access to those who do not lie. And can verify the truth. That is the way of all lies. You seem to have some idea that I have followed along without questioning, which is far from the truth. I think it is part of the "if you're not with me, you're against me" mentality. According to you, the germ theory cannot work...except that it has. Big disproof of your position. (I am a theorist by profession.)
Arguments are not won by barrage warfare, which is simple rudeness over the size of an entry on this board. So many points, not all can be answered completely.
And there are actually things more important than how I feel, but now I know you don't see that.
Your assertion is only an assertion, as you admit you cannot prove it.
Please tell me one thing I "admit I can't prove" that we've discussed. I can easily prove that "time and age" don't cause cataracts. I can prove Apostle Paul never talked about a man named Jesus. I can prove boogeyman-viruses have never been shown to exist. I can prove Dr. Malone has chosen to dismiss and ignore the fact that his (the establishment's) "proof of viruses" is a giant fraud.
That is the way of all lies. You seem to have some idea that I have followed along without questioning, which is far from the truth
I said your current positions are in-line with the echo-chamber herd. Not that you've never questioned anything. You have shown in your responses that nothing I've said you're simply INTERESTED IN QUESTIONING. You're not "interested" because you BELIEVE you (the herd) is already "right". This is why most people rarely question things. Because they think they already have the right answer.
I think it is part of the "if you're not with me, you're against me" mentality.
This is not my mentality. I'm well aware that almost nobody is "with me". If I had this mentality, I'd just say "you're all idiots for believing in this, that and the other and not believing me". But I once "believed this, that and the other" like all the rest of you. I was once part of the herd. As such, my approach is to give examples which hopefully encourage herd-members to start asking questions. But you didn't ask me any questions. All you've done is told me what you believe. This is why it appears to you as "barrage warfare"....hahaha...still love that phrase.
Instead of telling me what you believe (which I already know because I once believed the same), why don't you ask me a question, or for a link to an article, book, video that further makes my point in an effort to understand what I'm saying?
Do you recall how our whole dialogue got started. I accused Dr. Malone of being controlled opposition. Why did you jump to "Nuh-uh" so quickly? He's literally the perfect definition of "controlled opposition" in fact. Just because he's against COVID jabs, doesn't mean he's on our side. He's also the perfect definition of a "limited hangout". He tells you something you want to hear, but then goes on maintaining the FAR LARGER lie of germ theory.
Have you list sight of this?
According to you, the germ theory cannot work...except that it has. Big disproof of your position. (I am a theorist by profession.)
This is a perfect example of you telling me what you BELIEVE. Can you provide a single scientific experiment proving "germ theory" works? Myself and thousands of others looked for one during the last half of 2020 and all we could find were papers that DISPROVED "germ theory".
Let's not argue about BELIEFS though. What a waste of time. Produce the "facts" you BELIEVE you have. "Facts" that are based in science only please. I anxiously await your sharing here.
Arguments are not won by barrage warfare, which is simple rudeness over the size of an entry on this board. So many points, not all can be answered completely.
I'm not in any way trying to "argue" with you....ever. The length of my responses is an attempt to clearly explain what I'm driving at. I can say very short phrases but they only ever elicit "nuh-uhs" if you're not interested in understanding. Right?
Germ theory is a hoax
Boogeymen-viruses don't exist
Contagion is a myth
Time and age don't cause cataracts
Dr. Malone is controlled opposition
Apostle Paul never once mentions a man named Jesus
I could write 10,000 word articles or books on each of these bullet points. But if all you're going to do is say "nuh-uh", instead of asking me for more clarity or evidence, you're trapped in these "Herd belief systems". Belief systems, I might add, that are not serving your best interests. Something you don't yet realize because you have not yet questioned them.
And there are actually things more important than how I feel, but now I know you don't see that.
The "cause" of cataracts was not a subject I introduced, and is immaterial to the fact of their existence. If you know the cause, opthalmologic science would like to know (but they are not holding their breath). Basically, it seems to be polymerization (cross-linking) of the lens material, a time-related process. Sometimes fast and sometimes slow. Happens to plastics all the time.
My "current positions"? Like what? I doubt you know what they are. Often the outside world is correct. Want to bet anything that I think Einstein was correct about relativity?
Just as a quick search: Ephesians 1:15-17 "15 Therefore, I, too, hearing of your faith in the Lord Jesus and of your love[a] for all the holy ones, 16 do not cease giving thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers, 17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation resulting in knowledge of him." It is said he mentions Jesus by name 200 times in his 13 epistles.
The length of your response is revolting. That you can't get that through your head is a reflection on your perspicacity.
The "cause" of cataracts was not a subject I introduced, and is immaterial to the fact of their existence.
You brought up the subject of cataracts. I simply said the establishment explanation of the "cause" was totally incorrect.
If you know the cause, opthalmologic science would like to know (but they are not holding their breath).
I do know the cause. But I can assure you "opthalamogic science" is not interested in learning what I know. They've had nearly 50 years to do so. It would cost their field billions of dollars a year forevermore if they taught it to their duped slaves. If the public knew the cause, they're all but out of business.
Basically, it seems to be polymerization (cross-linking) of the lens material, a time-related process. Sometimes fast and sometimes slow. Happens to plastics all the time.
You just keep on telling me what you BELIEVE (which you were taught by establishment institutions). This is why my comments are "barrage warfare" to you. Because as soon as I make a point --- that you don't BELIEVE -- the rest just "passes right through" your consciousness, as "useless gibberish. See how that works?
My "current positions"? Like what?
Are you kidding? You BELIEVE boogeyman-viruses exist. You BELIEVE Dr. Malone is on our side. You BELIEVE establishment medical information is accurate. You BELIEVE Apostle Paul was talking about a man called "Jesus". Am I wrong?
Want to bet anything that I think Einstein was correct about relativity?
Yes, I'll bet every nickel I've got. How much would you be willing to put on the line? I could go a couple million if you're willing to. If not, how about $10,000 bucks? It's not worth my time for any less. We could prepare a simple contract if you want to die on this hill. Are you game?
Just as a quick search: Ephesians 1:15-17 "15 Therefore, I, too, hearing of your faith in the Lord Jesus and of your love[a] for all the holy ones, 16 do not cease giving thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers, 17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation resulting in knowledge of him." It is said he mentions Jesus by name 200 times in his 13 epistles.
More establishment dogma and deception, brought to you by the Roman, Vatican controlling cabal. How do you all keep not realizing this. Show me a verse where Paul talks about a MAN that lived 2000 years ago. Anything about that "man" will do. His height, his appearance, his age, his ministry, his miracles, his virgin birth, his resurrection, multiplying loaves and fish, turning water into wine, his Baptism on the Jordan. Just ONE THING about "the man and his life"....and I'll declare you the victor on this subject. Paul made thousands of references to "not a man", but you find 1 reference to a man, and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
The length of your response is revolting.
You allowed little old me to make you feel revolted? You've fallen for the ultimate cabal brainwashing technique. The one and only thing you can control and you gave away all your power to a random poster on GA. Congratulations! This is how the cabal has controlled you all your life. They made you forget about your one and only power. The only one that actually counts I might add!
BTW, you still haven't told me one thing that's more important than your feelings. Did you forget or could you not think of anything?
It may not occur to you that when cataracts are excised, they are also studied. Which is why we know they are partly or wholly crystallized. The increasing rigidity is also the cause of presbyopia. You do know what that is, right? We are born with a lot of accommodation, but are not aware we are running dry until we hit about 40 and start having troubles.
How about if I bet you ten million dollars that Einstein was wrong? You get to put up the money, since you made the challenge. I know how to disprove the Equivalence Principle, on which relativity rests. You get to prove Einstein was right. Go ahead. You can't.
Paul referred to Jesus Christ copiously in his epistles, the very person you are referring to. He encountered him in the spirit on the road to Damascus. He wouldn't have known anything about him recounted in the Gospels. Your claim was that he did not mention Jesus by name, nothing about "a man." Of did you think that Jesus was somehow not not a man, nor divine?
You are a common lurker in bull sessions, the sophist with the superior air and the trick challenges ("Aha, when I said Jesus, I meant a physical man, not also a divine person") leading absolutely nowhere, except to count coup. At least I left to posterity a better method for verifying the optical power of intraocular lenses.
Your assertion is only an assertion, as you admit you cannot prove it.
The recent lies have been exposed because we have access to those who do not lie. And can verify the truth. That is the way of all lies. You seem to have some idea that I have followed along without questioning, which is far from the truth. I think it is part of the "if you're not with me, you're against me" mentality. According to you, the germ theory cannot work...except that it has. Big disproof of your position. (I am a theorist by profession.)
Arguments are not won by barrage warfare, which is simple rudeness over the size of an entry on this board. So many points, not all can be answered completely.
And there are actually things more important than how I feel, but now I know you don't see that.
Please tell me one thing I "admit I can't prove" that we've discussed. I can easily prove that "time and age" don't cause cataracts. I can prove Apostle Paul never talked about a man named Jesus. I can prove boogeyman-viruses have never been shown to exist. I can prove Dr. Malone has chosen to dismiss and ignore the fact that his (the establishment's) "proof of viruses" is a giant fraud.
I said your current positions are in-line with the echo-chamber herd. Not that you've never questioned anything. You have shown in your responses that nothing I've said you're simply INTERESTED IN QUESTIONING. You're not "interested" because you BELIEVE you (the herd) is already "right". This is why most people rarely question things. Because they think they already have the right answer.
This is not my mentality. I'm well aware that almost nobody is "with me". If I had this mentality, I'd just say "you're all idiots for believing in this, that and the other and not believing me". But I once "believed this, that and the other" like all the rest of you. I was once part of the herd. As such, my approach is to give examples which hopefully encourage herd-members to start asking questions. But you didn't ask me any questions. All you've done is told me what you believe. This is why it appears to you as "barrage warfare"....hahaha...still love that phrase.
Instead of telling me what you believe (which I already know because I once believed the same), why don't you ask me a question, or for a link to an article, book, video that further makes my point in an effort to understand what I'm saying?
Do you recall how our whole dialogue got started. I accused Dr. Malone of being controlled opposition. Why did you jump to "Nuh-uh" so quickly? He's literally the perfect definition of "controlled opposition" in fact. Just because he's against COVID jabs, doesn't mean he's on our side. He's also the perfect definition of a "limited hangout". He tells you something you want to hear, but then goes on maintaining the FAR LARGER lie of germ theory.
Have you list sight of this?
This is a perfect example of you telling me what you BELIEVE. Can you provide a single scientific experiment proving "germ theory" works? Myself and thousands of others looked for one during the last half of 2020 and all we could find were papers that DISPROVED "germ theory".
Let's not argue about BELIEFS though. What a waste of time. Produce the "facts" you BELIEVE you have. "Facts" that are based in science only please. I anxiously await your sharing here.
I'm not in any way trying to "argue" with you....ever. The length of my responses is an attempt to clearly explain what I'm driving at. I can say very short phrases but they only ever elicit "nuh-uhs" if you're not interested in understanding. Right?
I could write 10,000 word articles or books on each of these bullet points. But if all you're going to do is say "nuh-uh", instead of asking me for more clarity or evidence, you're trapped in these "Herd belief systems". Belief systems, I might add, that are not serving your best interests. Something you don't yet realize because you have not yet questioned them.
Please name just one.
The "cause" of cataracts was not a subject I introduced, and is immaterial to the fact of their existence. If you know the cause, opthalmologic science would like to know (but they are not holding their breath). Basically, it seems to be polymerization (cross-linking) of the lens material, a time-related process. Sometimes fast and sometimes slow. Happens to plastics all the time.
My "current positions"? Like what? I doubt you know what they are. Often the outside world is correct. Want to bet anything that I think Einstein was correct about relativity?
Just as a quick search: Ephesians 1:15-17 "15 Therefore, I, too, hearing of your faith in the Lord Jesus and of your love[a] for all the holy ones, 16 do not cease giving thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers, 17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation resulting in knowledge of him." It is said he mentions Jesus by name 200 times in his 13 epistles.
The length of your response is revolting. That you can't get that through your head is a reflection on your perspicacity.
You brought up the subject of cataracts. I simply said the establishment explanation of the "cause" was totally incorrect.
I do know the cause. But I can assure you "opthalamogic science" is not interested in learning what I know. They've had nearly 50 years to do so. It would cost their field billions of dollars a year forevermore if they taught it to their duped slaves. If the public knew the cause, they're all but out of business.
You just keep on telling me what you BELIEVE (which you were taught by establishment institutions). This is why my comments are "barrage warfare" to you. Because as soon as I make a point --- that you don't BELIEVE -- the rest just "passes right through" your consciousness, as "useless gibberish. See how that works?
Are you kidding? You BELIEVE boogeyman-viruses exist. You BELIEVE Dr. Malone is on our side. You BELIEVE establishment medical information is accurate. You BELIEVE Apostle Paul was talking about a man called "Jesus". Am I wrong?
Yes, I'll bet every nickel I've got. How much would you be willing to put on the line? I could go a couple million if you're willing to. If not, how about $10,000 bucks? It's not worth my time for any less. We could prepare a simple contract if you want to die on this hill. Are you game?
More establishment dogma and deception, brought to you by the Roman, Vatican controlling cabal. How do you all keep not realizing this. Show me a verse where Paul talks about a MAN that lived 2000 years ago. Anything about that "man" will do. His height, his appearance, his age, his ministry, his miracles, his virgin birth, his resurrection, multiplying loaves and fish, turning water into wine, his Baptism on the Jordan. Just ONE THING about "the man and his life"....and I'll declare you the victor on this subject. Paul made thousands of references to "not a man", but you find 1 reference to a man, and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
You allowed little old me to make you feel revolted? You've fallen for the ultimate cabal brainwashing technique. The one and only thing you can control and you gave away all your power to a random poster on GA. Congratulations! This is how the cabal has controlled you all your life. They made you forget about your one and only power. The only one that actually counts I might add!
BTW, you still haven't told me one thing that's more important than your feelings. Did you forget or could you not think of anything?
It may not occur to you that when cataracts are excised, they are also studied. Which is why we know they are partly or wholly crystallized. The increasing rigidity is also the cause of presbyopia. You do know what that is, right? We are born with a lot of accommodation, but are not aware we are running dry until we hit about 40 and start having troubles.
How about if I bet you ten million dollars that Einstein was wrong? You get to put up the money, since you made the challenge. I know how to disprove the Equivalence Principle, on which relativity rests. You get to prove Einstein was right. Go ahead. You can't.
Paul referred to Jesus Christ copiously in his epistles, the very person you are referring to. He encountered him in the spirit on the road to Damascus. He wouldn't have known anything about him recounted in the Gospels. Your claim was that he did not mention Jesus by name, nothing about "a man." Of did you think that Jesus was somehow not not a man, nor divine?
You are a common lurker in bull sessions, the sophist with the superior air and the trick challenges ("Aha, when I said Jesus, I meant a physical man, not also a divine person") leading absolutely nowhere, except to count coup. At least I left to posterity a better method for verifying the optical power of intraocular lenses.