I have been slipping "depopulation" into conversations with people on both sides: awake and asleep. You know what the asleep peeps do... but, it's the ones I know to be awake who surprise me with smirks and eyerolls. I have only asked 9 people who are awake in my opinion. Only one so far agreed about the depopulation agenda. I guess the rest are not awake enough.
Anyway, I wonder if greed is an easier sell to rile people up... "Big Pharma is so greedy they didn't care if people got injured or died. They need to be held accountable."
I personally think that we are branded as crackpots when we start talking about a depop agenda. Maybe a middle rhetorical step is needed... something to get peeps closer to realizing there is a depop agenda?
Curious to know what you think?
I've been going with greed as the default from the beginning because it's undeniable. Once people start to accept greed, you can sell them on depopulation of old people to save money on healthcare and social security payments. From there you can let them figure it out, and most that make it that far will do so
Yep even normies tend to agree that Big Pharma is overly greedy, the hard step is getting them to accept that their doctors have all been in on it as well to keep them sick, whether knowingly or by being useful idiots who never questioned what they were taught in medical schools funded by said corporate interests. A big problem though is that if you're much healthier than them they tend to pull a Clot Adams and insist that you're just lucky not that you actually know any better.