4
Jalapeno_gringo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe, just maybe, they're making them think the money will come back so they don't cease operations and use up their reserves.

2
Jalapeno_gringo 2 points ago +3 / -1

Good catch. I also noticed the comment regarding the lack of furniture or interior finish materials. That's likely a storefront glass frame. But the observation remains valid. It does look like a planned demolition

1
Jalapeno_gringo 1 point ago +2 / -1

I went back to make sure I wasn't lying, and nope, it wasn't me that down voted you

1
Jalapeno_gringo 1 point ago +2 / -1

I didn't down vote you.

2
Jalapeno_gringo 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, I live in the USA and we're a long way away. We are not going to resolve longstanding disputes there. They need to work it out for themselves

6
Jalapeno_gringo 6 points ago +7 / -1

Not my circus, not my monkeys

4
Jalapeno_gringo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can hear the calls for a booster now. If she didn't miss her booster, it never would have happened

1
Jalapeno_gringo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would need to think about that for a few days. I don't know the answer to some of the questions, but you might be very surprised at how much information our military has

2
Jalapeno_gringo 2 points ago +2 / -0

That bill passed the year before if I'm not mistaken. That's why I say that it needs to be investigated, starting with 2016 and forward. They pass the laws they need to cover their tracks before they act

2
Jalapeno_gringo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a feeling those 2 lost aircraft were not lost at all and most likely relocated into a strategic location without detection. That's what I would consider a top secret mission. I was ready to type some more info regarding procedures and thought better of it. Sorry, but sometimes I wish I could say more.

1
Jalapeno_gringo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Captain is = to Colonel, correct? If so, it might be a setup. They don't give top secret missions to lower level officers

2
Jalapeno_gringo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe you are somewhat correct and I could be wrong, but I believe that Colorado had just passed a law prior to this incident that removed the county clerk and recorders office from certifying the machines and put it under state control ( because they control the state). This story starts long before this incident and needs to be thoroughly investigated. I don't trust most Republicans in this state

4
Jalapeno_gringo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm starting to wonder if we didn't lose the planes at all but just relocated them without detection

3
Jalapeno_gringo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or maybe she couldn't get any action on the outside and she wanted a captive audience while being "gay for the stay"

2
Jalapeno_gringo 2 points ago +3 / -1

Tina Peters didn't rig the machine. She gave access to someone she shouldn't have. That's all they really got her for, and process crimes around that. She crossed a line, but maybe only for probation, not 9 years

view more: Next ›