I have been slipping "depopulation" into conversations with people on both sides: awake and asleep. You know what the asleep peeps do... but, it's the ones I know to be awake who surprise me with smirks and eyerolls. I have only asked 9 people who are awake in my opinion. Only one so far agreed about the depopulation agenda. I guess the rest are not awake enough.
Anyway, I wonder if greed is an easier sell to rile people up... "Big Pharma is so greedy they didn't care if people got injured or died. They need to be held accountable."
I personally think that we are branded as crackpots when we start talking about a depop agenda. Maybe a middle rhetorical step is needed... something to get peeps closer to realizing there is a depop agenda?
Curious to know what you think?
The leech is not interested in the death of its host, but in its inability to resist. The larger agenda is not depopulation but emasculation and comorbidity. Those are the words I'd use with you. I think a great talking point would be that Big Pharma is interested in people staying sick because it's self-evident that that's how they make money. Backup point, for millennia doctors used to make money by keeping people healthy so their advice would continue to be trusted for generations; now they don't care because all the risks are assigned to you legally and all the money benefits to them, and that's due to corrupt government, etc. So the word might be their agenda is just sickness and not healing.