all we've been told about round earth and everything else is true.
Well, that's overstating it a bit, don't you think? "The Earth isn't flat" isn't the same as saying that "everything we've been told is true" or the like.
"Everything You Know is Wrong" -- Actual title of a comedy LP from the 60's. (Yes, there used to be comedy features on LP records back then).
ok, but explain Lazer targeting onboard a ship targeting an enemy ship at 50 miles out. Not with drones flying high above but ship to ship. The technology is real, and it works. What does not work is the math for the curvature of the earth. 8 inches per mile squared is like the old riddle; would you rather have a million dollars, or a penny doubled every day for 30 days?
1x1, then 2x2, 4x4, 16 x16, 256x256, 65, 536 x 65,536, 4,294,976,296 x .... etc.
I'm not saying the earth is flat, I'm saying we have technology that refutes mathematical theory on the earth's curvature being roughly 8 inches squared per mile. And if we can "line of site target" something at sea level from 50 miles out there is something wrong with the mathematical theory.
That's a very stupid (excuse me for the use of the word very), but a very stupid rule of thumb. It's a linear measure applied to a spherical surface. Puhleaaze.
I asked this question to an Airforce contact. Because this is the most compelling, head scratching aspect of technology that refutes the curvature of the earth theory.
I asked about Lazer targeting at sea level from naval ships at 50 miles out, which should put the target below the horizon or line of sight by just under half a mile and yet Lazer targeting (light does not bend) can target an object at sea level from 50-100 miles out.
By the math this should be impossible.
When I asked him about it, because he is a high-level math guy and familiar with high tech weapons systems, he was a bit freaked out because he quickly did the math in his head and realized, (as if for the first time) that there is something amiss here. He did not answer and quickly shifted into cognitive dissidence mode and changed the subject.
Accusing you of posting bait can mean different things.
Ragebait - A post intended to anger people and therefore elicit angry responses; to cause argument, infighting.
They could also mean you are trying to bait people into "outing" themselves as "flat earthers". My guess is they mean the former, but who knows.
Regardless, you have stumbled into the deepest of rabbit holes. Welcome.
On the one hand, the seas/lakes/ponds/etc are flat, period. The short video you posted proved this beyond any doubt. There are also may logical arguments to the contrary. Here's the part that will bake your noodle...
If you made a simulated world, no matter how well you made it, there would be flaws. Concessions would have to be made. How would those flaws look to beings living inside the simulation? Conflicting laws of nature. Yeah.
This topic is forbidden to discuss on this platform. So is chemtrails, also verifiably true.
Clif High has a great substack. He refers to the "matrix" as the "ontology". Pretty sure he thinks FE is crazy but he accepts chemtrails. He has schizophrenia but he's a genius, we disagree on some things.
Not sure why this is so tough for people. Everything ever engineered was done so on a datum line. Everything. Cars, bridges, trucks, canals, fridges, skyscrapers, etc. The curve is never included, because the math would be INSANE.
Yeah, I am wondering how long it well take for a good discussion like this that begs questioning will be deleted.
This subject as well as geoengineering is specifically forbidden to discuss on this platform. They don't not want the topic of Q to be associated with fringe theories.
Actually, once you are in space, out of our atmosphere, the sun and stars disappear from vision altogether. That is why they coated Apollo mission helmet visors in gold with striation lines etched in the glass, light without reflectivity is invisible to human sight.
Trust me, when you go out into the void, all light disappears from vision, look it up.
Rail guns are real.
The "flat earth" is not.
a firmament would not exactly be flat, but thank you for clarifying that all we've been told about round earth and everything else is true.
imho this awakening is about coming to realize how little we actually know and could possibly know, but what do I know ? I know nothing :)
I personally agree with Sleepydude's hypothesis: Earth is layered like an Onion
Well, that's overstating it a bit, don't you think? "The Earth isn't flat" isn't the same as saying that "everything we've been told is true" or the like.
"Everything You Know is Wrong" -- Actual title of a comedy LP from the 60's. (Yes, there used to be comedy features on LP records back then).
Me either that's why I asked... you never learn if you don't ask questions
A missile flies in a parabolic path, unless it is a guided missile.
Guided missiles fly to a prescribed path. That does not have to be ...
Oh NVM
I realize now, that this is a bait thread.
Forget it.
ok, but explain Lazer targeting onboard a ship targeting an enemy ship at 50 miles out. Not with drones flying high above but ship to ship. The technology is real, and it works. What does not work is the math for the curvature of the earth. 8 inches per mile squared is like the old riddle; would you rather have a million dollars, or a penny doubled every day for 30 days?
1x1, then 2x2, 4x4, 16 x16, 256x256, 65, 536 x 65,536, 4,294,976,296 x .... etc.
I'm not saying the earth is flat, I'm saying we have technology that refutes mathematical theory on the earth's curvature being roughly 8 inches squared per mile. And if we can "line of site target" something at sea level from 50 miles out there is something wrong with the mathematical theory.
Fact.
Let me stop you right there.
That's a very stupid (excuse me for the use of the word very), but a very stupid rule of thumb. It's a linear measure applied to a spherical surface. Puhleaaze.
= R(1 - cos(θ)), where θ = d/R, should be used
What's a bait thread?
That's when a stinking person lays a scent-trail to entrap autists to make wordy replies. Then, a bait-thread is used to enact a wee ban-hammer.
I asked this question to an Airforce contact. Because this is the most compelling, head scratching aspect of technology that refutes the curvature of the earth theory.
I asked about Lazer targeting at sea level from naval ships at 50 miles out, which should put the target below the horizon or line of sight by just under half a mile and yet Lazer targeting (light does not bend) can target an object at sea level from 50-100 miles out.
By the math this should be impossible.
When I asked him about it, because he is a high-level math guy and familiar with high tech weapons systems, he was a bit freaked out because he quickly did the math in his head and realized, (as if for the first time) that there is something amiss here. He did not answer and quickly shifted into cognitive dissidence mode and changed the subject.
Must be that light really is affected by gravity and THAT is what they don't want us to know /s
Doesn't light bend if you have mirrors/metal objects, Bounce off each other?
No, it refracts but it does not bend, simple geometry, if it hits a reflective object at one angle then then it will refract at the opposite angle.
Which also implies, that everything we see is illusion and a reflection of the truth, even light.
There's always insults and character attacks but never facts to disprove
A rail gun has projectile drop the same as a rifle bullet: it does NOT shoot flat. It would never be used against a high speed target.
The first speaker was talking about laser weapons... which can't damage a target 100 miles away. If they could, they would have them in service now.
Also, the Earth's rotational axis is tilted approximately 23.5 degrees.
Bullshit retard-think clickbait.
Oh for fucks sake. Get some better bait.
2 person who said this what is bait about it? It came to my email and I have questions, I trust this groups opinion...
Accusing you of posting bait can mean different things.
Ragebait - A post intended to anger people and therefore elicit angry responses; to cause argument, infighting.
They could also mean you are trying to bait people into "outing" themselves as "flat earthers". My guess is they mean the former, but who knows.
Regardless, you have stumbled into the deepest of rabbit holes. Welcome.
On the one hand, the seas/lakes/ponds/etc are flat, period. The short video you posted proved this beyond any doubt. There are also may logical arguments to the contrary. Here's the part that will bake your noodle...
If you made a simulated world, no matter how well you made it, there would be flaws. Concessions would have to be made. How would those flaws look to beings living inside the simulation? Conflicting laws of nature. Yeah.
This topic is forbidden to discuss on this platform. So is chemtrails, also verifiably true.
Welcome to the party.
Tiktok, Chans, Rumble, Substack.
Clif High has a great substack. He refers to the "matrix" as the "ontology". Pretty sure he thinks FE is crazy but he accepts chemtrails. He has schizophrenia but he's a genius, we disagree on some things.
"My Lunch Break" is a deep dive too.
Message me if you have questions.
Awesome Thank you...
You're welcome. u/#merica
Not sure why this is so tough for people. Everything ever engineered was done so on a datum line. Everything. Cars, bridges, trucks, canals, fridges, skyscrapers, etc. The curve is never included, because the math would be INSANE.
Thread deleted in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...
Yeah, I am wondering how long it well take for a good discussion like this that begs questioning will be deleted.
This subject as well as geoengineering is specifically forbidden to discuss on this platform. They don't not want the topic of Q to be associated with fringe theories.
And it's gone. lol
We can still discuss but it is removed from the main pages and no one who did not comment on the thread can see it any longer.
Yep, and I don't want the topic of Q to be associated with denying obviously factual information for emotional/political reasons.
If the sun is 94m miles away, and it lights up our planet Earth like it does, how the fuck is all that space between us so dark? I call bs.
BS computer Sci + Math here
If the sun is 94m miles away, and it lights up our planet Earth like it does, how the fuck is all that space between us so dark? I call bs.
Actually, once you are in space, out of our atmosphere, the sun and stars disappear from vision altogether. That is why they coated Apollo mission helmet visors in gold with striation lines etched in the glass, light without reflectivity is invisible to human sight.
Trust me, when you go out into the void, all light disappears from vision, look it up.