we shall agree to disagree. perhaps I'm a dolt, average or of high intelligence. if we can even accurately measure such. is high intelligence having the best memory (e.g., a doctor) or is it the ability to problem solve and critically think and think outside the box? I'd say the latter but that's just an opinion.
not long ago people believed the planet to be something other than round. from one quick search:
"It’s interesting to note that, even though the idea of a spherical Earth has been around for thousands of years, it was only in the last couple hundred years that we finally had definitive proof that the world is round. And it took even longer for everyone to accept the fact! Today, we take for granted that the Earth is a globe."
so, while we all want to believe that we progress and have become a more intelligent society who really knows. many biblical verses speak of a firmament. those that believe in God and Jesus might maintain faith in the bible.
this issue we argue is of little import to what the great awakening is about. we need to awaken to the horrors of what the cabal has done and continues to strive for and snap out of the notion that we can rely on anything we've been taught.
it seems to me that you'd rather spend time trying to convince me to drop the idea that the earth is not spherical than you would trying to convince hard core normies that 9/11 was likely controlled demo of 3 buildings. how will the world change if you convince me the earth is spherical? absolute waste of time
No one said you had to be of high intelligence. Doctors today don’t rely on memory, everything is on a tablet or computer. You didn’t know that eclipses involve sun, moon, and earth. That tells me that you don’t have basic scientific knowledge. Commenter Rededub told you how we know, mathematically, that the earth is not flat.
As far as the idea of a spherical earth, we’ve known this for a very long time.
“The Greek scholar Eratosthenes of Cyrene was the first to calculate the Earth's circumference, doing so in the 3rd century BCE using geometry and astronomy. He observed that the Sun was directly overhead in Syene (now Aswan) on the summer solstice, while in Alexandria, a shadow indicated the Sun was at an angle. By measuring the angle of the shadow and the distance between the cities, he was able to determine the circumference of the spherical Earth with remarkable accuracy, a feat still impressive today.”
As far as Biblical fact: Isaiah 40:22 refers to the earth as a sphere. Go read it.
What I’m trying to get across to you, just because you don’t know the truth, doesn’t mean that there aren’t those of us who actually do know. Not because someone told us, but because we’ve either researched or calculated or both.
As far as 9/11 goes. Yeah I’ve red pilled many normies about it. Flash point of jet fuel, melting point of steel, I calculated g of all three building using physics equations, told people about the size of the particles of dust that were produced and how that size relates to the energy that had to be present in order to cause particulate matter of that size. How many buildings of that type have fallen due to “fires”.
I’m trying to get you to understand that by saying that we don’t know the truth about anything is a Marxist idea.
“In Marxist thought, truth is understood as a social construct, an objective reality that is uncovered through theory and proven through practice, rather than being a fixed, absolute concept.”
While you may not know the answer, it’s not a good idea to assume that others don’t either. Also, I don’t believe man has progressed and become a more intelligent society than when we first started. Evolution theory is bullshit.
you seem quite knowledgeable. have you personally done the work and recalculated using this process you quoted? otherwise, anyone relying on this "impressive feat" is simply believing a story told which story is subject to biases.
not a scholar of marxism ideas but if we look at sex for example, this to me is a clear attempt by marxists to leave people confused and ultimately divided. alternatively, I can still say that I'm not 100% certain I'm a male but that I'm about as certain as I could be about anything in life that I am a male if this bizarre topic ever came up. being humble about your knowledge when expressed in the right way and to the right people should not diminish your credibility and should, IMO, actually increase it because you can be humble enough to recognize there's a chance you're wrong and that new info could come to light to change your findings. the science is never settled. I have yet to be convinced as to earth's spherical shape and determining this is far from on my priority list to resolve and it shouldn't be on yours to convince anyone. to what end?
while I couldn't be much more convinced that 9/11 was an inside job or that Sandy Hook was a false flag, I still recognize that some evidence could possibly be presented that I need to remain open to that I might prove I've been wrong
Yes, I have personally calculated the acceleration of the twin towers. What more information would you need to 100% believe that you’re male. Are you more convinced that 9/11 was an inside job or are you more convinced that you’re a male? Just wondering, carry on flerfer.
we shall agree to disagree. perhaps I'm a dolt, average or of high intelligence. if we can even accurately measure such. is high intelligence having the best memory (e.g., a doctor) or is it the ability to problem solve and critically think and think outside the box? I'd say the latter but that's just an opinion.
not long ago people believed the planet to be something other than round. from one quick search:
"It’s interesting to note that, even though the idea of a spherical Earth has been around for thousands of years, it was only in the last couple hundred years that we finally had definitive proof that the world is round. And it took even longer for everyone to accept the fact! Today, we take for granted that the Earth is a globe."
so, while we all want to believe that we progress and have become a more intelligent society who really knows. many biblical verses speak of a firmament. those that believe in God and Jesus might maintain faith in the bible.
this issue we argue is of little import to what the great awakening is about. we need to awaken to the horrors of what the cabal has done and continues to strive for and snap out of the notion that we can rely on anything we've been taught.
it seems to me that you'd rather spend time trying to convince me to drop the idea that the earth is not spherical than you would trying to convince hard core normies that 9/11 was likely controlled demo of 3 buildings. how will the world change if you convince me the earth is spherical? absolute waste of time
No one said you had to be of high intelligence. Doctors today don’t rely on memory, everything is on a tablet or computer. You didn’t know that eclipses involve sun, moon, and earth. That tells me that you don’t have basic scientific knowledge. Commenter Rededub told you how we know, mathematically, that the earth is not flat. As far as the idea of a spherical earth, we’ve known this for a very long time. “The Greek scholar Eratosthenes of Cyrene was the first to calculate the Earth's circumference, doing so in the 3rd century BCE using geometry and astronomy. He observed that the Sun was directly overhead in Syene (now Aswan) on the summer solstice, while in Alexandria, a shadow indicated the Sun was at an angle. By measuring the angle of the shadow and the distance between the cities, he was able to determine the circumference of the spherical Earth with remarkable accuracy, a feat still impressive today.” As far as Biblical fact: Isaiah 40:22 refers to the earth as a sphere. Go read it. What I’m trying to get across to you, just because you don’t know the truth, doesn’t mean that there aren’t those of us who actually do know. Not because someone told us, but because we’ve either researched or calculated or both. As far as 9/11 goes. Yeah I’ve red pilled many normies about it. Flash point of jet fuel, melting point of steel, I calculated g of all three building using physics equations, told people about the size of the particles of dust that were produced and how that size relates to the energy that had to be present in order to cause particulate matter of that size. How many buildings of that type have fallen due to “fires”. I’m trying to get you to understand that by saying that we don’t know the truth about anything is a Marxist idea. “In Marxist thought, truth is understood as a social construct, an objective reality that is uncovered through theory and proven through practice, rather than being a fixed, absolute concept.” While you may not know the answer, it’s not a good idea to assume that others don’t either. Also, I don’t believe man has progressed and become a more intelligent society than when we first started. Evolution theory is bullshit.
you seem quite knowledgeable. have you personally done the work and recalculated using this process you quoted? otherwise, anyone relying on this "impressive feat" is simply believing a story told which story is subject to biases.
not a scholar of marxism ideas but if we look at sex for example, this to me is a clear attempt by marxists to leave people confused and ultimately divided. alternatively, I can still say that I'm not 100% certain I'm a male but that I'm about as certain as I could be about anything in life that I am a male if this bizarre topic ever came up. being humble about your knowledge when expressed in the right way and to the right people should not diminish your credibility and should, IMO, actually increase it because you can be humble enough to recognize there's a chance you're wrong and that new info could come to light to change your findings. the science is never settled. I have yet to be convinced as to earth's spherical shape and determining this is far from on my priority list to resolve and it shouldn't be on yours to convince anyone. to what end?
while I couldn't be much more convinced that 9/11 was an inside job or that Sandy Hook was a false flag, I still recognize that some evidence could possibly be presented that I need to remain open to that I might prove I've been wrong
Yes, I have personally calculated the acceleration of the twin towers. What more information would you need to 100% believe that you’re male. Are you more convinced that 9/11 was an inside job or are you more convinced that you’re a male? Just wondering, carry on flerfer.