well I guess graduating summa cum laude in engineering with plenty of physics classes was a farce :) too many questions for me to buy that we're spinning at over 1,000 mph and we don't feel any lifting g force or there's not an insane wind created from the atmosphere above us that experiences a different gravitational force being further away from the center and surface of the earth. who knows. you and I will never solve this and more importantly we don't need to
So this is like graduating high-school with honors and not being able to read and write, ya? So through all of your apparent schooling you never really grasped the size of the planet, huh? 1000mph you wouldn't feel as its relative - we're moving with it and it doesn't create enough force to escape gravity - for that you'd have to be going over 17k mph. Then pull in relative speeds and the atmosphere moving right along with us and indeed you would feel no wind; although with Coriolis effect is there really no wind? I have to believe either you didn't graduate with an engineering degree at all or you're trolling. Either way - you need to go back to school, FLERF
I am regurgitating what has been proven - countless times over. To think the world isn't spinning and isn't a sphere is just moronic. I feel dumber having to explain this. Sure, we all grasp onto what many would think are conspiracy theories here... but this isn't one of them. Its like talking to a liberal and telling them of something proven only to have them come back with "you need to prove this" - nope, I don't and in this matter I am completely comfortable believing you are either an idiot or are trolling - but seriously, go pull up some SciManDan to get made fun of a bit. "What we found is, is when we turned on that gyroscope we found that we were picking up a drift. A 15 degree per hour drift" - Bob Knodel (flat-earther that proved the sphere nicely)
anything but a liar. what have I lied about curiously...my schooling?
not a lie, but what would it matter? if I DM'ed you my diploma and credentials proving my honesty than what, you'd still think I'm a moron or might actually respect me?
You’re claiming to have graduated with a degree in engineering and you think calculating g of the twin towers is impressive? Dude, seriously, my first year physics students in HIGH SCHOOL could do it, the academic level, not the AP. Geez, and you didn’t know that eclipses involved earth, moon, and sun.
where did I claim that "calculating g of the twin towers" was impressive? and what does that statement even mean? "g" of the twin towers. they seem to have fell at virtual free fall, 9.82 m/s^2 or whatever they tell us, but I never felt the need to do a lab study on it. it's apparent. and Bldg 7 couldn't be more obvious. no calculating needed and in case you missed the NIST report by "engineers" they managed to come up with some other calcs, which is only further proof that enginnering isn't even a perfect science because the engineer can add in resistances, etc that may not actually be there
The fact that you even ask “what does that statement even mean” tells me that you don’t know. Guess you missed all of the other reports by engineers and physicists that completely disagree with them.
well I guess graduating summa cum laude in engineering with plenty of physics classes was a farce :) too many questions for me to buy that we're spinning at over 1,000 mph and we don't feel any lifting g force or there's not an insane wind created from the atmosphere above us that experiences a different gravitational force being further away from the center and surface of the earth. who knows. you and I will never solve this and more importantly we don't need to
So this is like graduating high-school with honors and not being able to read and write, ya? So through all of your apparent schooling you never really grasped the size of the planet, huh? 1000mph you wouldn't feel as its relative - we're moving with it and it doesn't create enough force to escape gravity - for that you'd have to be going over 17k mph. Then pull in relative speeds and the atmosphere moving right along with us and indeed you would feel no wind; although with Coriolis effect is there really no wind? I have to believe either you didn't graduate with an engineering degree at all or you're trolling. Either way - you need to go back to school, FLERF
you are regurgitating what they TAUGHT you. think for yourself and realize what they taught us needs to be proven. or stay normie and don't
best wishes, and I mean this sincerely
I am regurgitating what has been proven - countless times over. To think the world isn't spinning and isn't a sphere is just moronic. I feel dumber having to explain this. Sure, we all grasp onto what many would think are conspiracy theories here... but this isn't one of them. Its like talking to a liberal and telling them of something proven only to have them come back with "you need to prove this" - nope, I don't and in this matter I am completely comfortable believing you are either an idiot or are trolling - but seriously, go pull up some SciManDan to get made fun of a bit. "What we found is, is when we turned on that gyroscope we found that we were picking up a drift. A 15 degree per hour drift" - Bob Knodel (flat-earther that proved the sphere nicely)
got it, so basically "debunked" and you just trust it has been because many tell you so. very independent minded of you.
SciMan is who you look to for your truth. nice, he sounds like a clown that could have his own late night show. please, GTFO with this guy
OP is a freakin liar.
anything but a liar. what have I lied about curiously...my schooling?
not a lie, but what would it matter? if I DM'ed you my diploma and credentials proving my honesty than what, you'd still think I'm a moron or might actually respect me?
You’re claiming to have graduated with a degree in engineering and you think calculating g of the twin towers is impressive? Dude, seriously, my first year physics students in HIGH SCHOOL could do it, the academic level, not the AP. Geez, and you didn’t know that eclipses involved earth, moon, and sun.
where did I claim that "calculating g of the twin towers" was impressive? and what does that statement even mean? "g" of the twin towers. they seem to have fell at virtual free fall, 9.82 m/s^2 or whatever they tell us, but I never felt the need to do a lab study on it. it's apparent. and Bldg 7 couldn't be more obvious. no calculating needed and in case you missed the NIST report by "engineers" they managed to come up with some other calcs, which is only further proof that enginnering isn't even a perfect science because the engineer can add in resistances, etc that may not actually be there
The fact that you even ask “what does that statement even mean” tells me that you don’t know. Guess you missed all of the other reports by engineers and physicists that completely disagree with them.
https://www.youtube.com/@SciManDan