So lefties are now trying to hallucinate this narrative that Tyler Robinson was a groyper who was ultra-ultra-right wing and super far to the right of Charlie Kirk, and so he shot him for being too moderate.
Meanwhile, actual righties are saying that Charlie Kirk was shot by Mossad for being too far right and criticizing Israel too much.
If ultra-right wing groypers wanted to steer a large population of young men further right, wouldn't the best plan for them to have let Charlie Kirk do what he was already doing?
They literally have no idea what conservatives or right-wingers actually think. They have zero concept of it. Just completely made up and hallucinated out of whole cloth.
I honestly think Tyler is a patsy and isn't the real assassin. He's just a useful patsy for the narrative. There were too many odd things that happened that day.
That private jet that turned off it's transponder dropped the killer into the colorado rockies without a chute and returned.
Yup I think the old dude who was arrested distracted the crowd while the real shooter hopped on the plane and left. Tyler was the patsy.
I've heard about the jet, good theory, plausible.
I think he was the real assassin, he was just set up as a fall guy and cut loose. He was probably made to think there'd be a real escape plan and that he'd get away with it because he's young and gullible. He was probably a dumb radical who was treated like a mushroom, fed a bunch of shit and kept in the dark. I'd be surprised if he knows anything significant, but he probably was the real shooter even if there were others pulling the strings.
Seems like many of the "shooters" out there are under 25? Did Tyler really have enough training to sniper shoot from 200-240 feet with ONE shot? Doesn't add up imo.
Grok said a novice had about a 25% chance. Not sure if it accounted for charlie wearing Kevlar
It's not as hard as you might think. I was raised around guns because I had a conservative gun-enjoying dad too, and I could make a 200 yard shot within a 6 inch spread by the time I was his age just from plinking at the range. Charlie was sitting down, he wasn't running, and he was shooting from a prone position for maximum stability.
Of course it's a tragedy and a horrible thing and should never have happened, but that is not an 'impossible' shot by any means.
This.
Right? The whole "oh they needed a martyr to get what they want" thing falls apart when they're already doing what you want.
Everything has been WW3 psyops since 9/11.
They were using psyops back in WW2 against Nazis. I'm pretty sure they were using them on us as well.
You have to admit they used a pretty sterile person to carry this out. No political affiliation, hadnt voted in past two elections. No online presence thats extraordinary that ive seen. Couldnt twll by anything prior to thos where the kid even stood. How convenient for the conspirators.