First of all, source? What's the source? Second of all, how easily could a digital image of a letter be doctored? Third of all, what? Why would the Rabbi send this to the Kirk family 8 days before the planned assassination? It's way too bleedingly obvious, no?
If the Rabbi knew that the plan was to kill Kirk, why prepare the letter beforehand? That would be dumb. What if the <planned" assassination was planned for Sept 1? Then why send it a week later.
Seems to me its far more likely that September 12, was doctored to read Sept 2.
The date 9 Elul 5785 corresponds, according to Grok, to August 31, 2025, not Sept 2. So what's with that?
If your bias is that this was a big conspiracy by Israel and Mossad and whoever else to take down Kirk, then your FIRST response to information should be questioning it and pulling it apart, not simply leaping to accept it because it suits your bias.
When people do NOT do that, I find it hard to take them seriously.
My bias is genuinely "wait and see" because multiple groups had reason for Charlie to be dead.
One look at recent polling as to young men's perspectives on more traditional gender roles shows that Charlie was having an enormous impact. Considering that cabal & communist forces have been trying to destroy those roles for decades (and sadly succeeding), they could not have been happy with Charlie's work.
I kept my original post short & sweet because if I do talk about Israel, especially in a "let's not jump to negative conclusions" manner, it tends to arouse a certain segment of the GAW membership, as I'm sure you're aware.
Hence the simple "I'm taking a wait and see" approach.
I mean, yeah.
First of all, source? What's the source? Second of all, how easily could a digital image of a letter be doctored? Third of all, what? Why would the Rabbi send this to the Kirk family 8 days before the planned assassination? It's way too bleedingly obvious, no?
If the Rabbi knew that the plan was to kill Kirk, why prepare the letter beforehand? That would be dumb. What if the <planned" assassination was planned for Sept 1? Then why send it a week later.
Seems to me its far more likely that September 12, was doctored to read Sept 2.
The date 9 Elul 5785 corresponds, according to Grok, to August 31, 2025, not Sept 2. So what's with that?
If your bias is that this was a big conspiracy by Israel and Mossad and whoever else to take down Kirk, then your FIRST response to information should be questioning it and pulling it apart, not simply leaping to accept it because it suits your bias.
When people do NOT do that, I find it hard to take them seriously.
Grok is wrong. 9 Elul 5785 is Sept. 2, 2025. Always verify any AI with multiple sources.
Kek. I queried Grok on multiple instances with slightly different texts and questions, and ended up getting 3 different results for9 Elul 5785.
Well, if you want to be confident that the info you have is accurate, anyway!
Or until you find the answer you want lol
My bias is genuinely "wait and see" because multiple groups had reason for Charlie to be dead.
One look at recent polling as to young men's perspectives on more traditional gender roles shows that Charlie was having an enormous impact. Considering that cabal & communist forces have been trying to destroy those roles for decades (and sadly succeeding), they could not have been happy with Charlie's work.
I kept my original post short & sweet because if I do talk about Israel, especially in a "let's not jump to negative conclusions" manner, it tends to arouse a certain segment of the GAW membership, as I'm sure you're aware.
Hence the simple "I'm taking a wait and see" approach.