so… there is just too much content coming out for anyone to see everything, so im just gonna hook you up with some places to start looking if you wanna look deeper…
bottom line is, people are gonna believe whatever they wanna believe…
And most people will go seeking confirmation, for their pre-existing beliefs.
I’m gonna guess that you have a pre-existing belief is that Charlie Kirk actually got shot and killed,
and I also know that if you really wanted to, you could watch mainstream media all day long and they would confirm that belief every day for the next six weeks…
And then theres me…
I instantly knew the story was bullshit
Instantly.
As in the title headline sentence wasn’t even finished and I knew it was bullshit.
So I confess that I went looking for confirmation. I went looking for other people saying it was bullshit, and what do you know I found what I was looking for
“seek and ye shall find“
So what did i find?
Thousands of independent individuals
(or a massive bot farm?)
And they were ALL calling BULLSHIT….
Think of it this way…
How many “primary sources” are for this story?
And when I say primary sources, I don’t mean a tweet from Donald Trump
I don’t mean a tweet from Benjamin Netanyahu
I don’t mean, CNN, who was not there at the scene
I don’t mean Fox News who is also probably not there at the scene
Pretty soon you don’t have very many actual sources on the ground,
but how many should you have?
There should’ve been a massive audience there right that’s what it showed on video?
Where are the thousand different camera views of this event?
I can tell you when I go to some event. I’m taking pictures. I’m taking video…
But even if you added up all the people that were at the event, all the people who supposedly were in the vicinity of this event,
all the people at the hospital (rabbit hole)
And even added in all of the supposed credible media, the credible influencers…
Still, the raw number of primary sources is under a few hundred…
Now compare that to the number of tweets on Twitter, calling bullshit
It’s not even comparable,
So let me put it to you this way…
Even if 100 people say 2+2=4
I still want to hear from that one guy who says it isn’t…
I want to understand his reasoning
I want to be able to think like he thinks
Maybe i am just one crazy guy on the internet?
But what if there were two crazy guys on the Internet, saying the same thing?
What if they were 100 crazy guys on the Internet, saying the same thing?
At what point do you stop and ask yourself what the heck is going on here?
Here is a link to Twitter search for Kirk hoax and a few other choice keywords
so… there is just too much content coming out for anyone to see everything, so im just gonna hook you up with some places to start looking if you wanna look deeper…
bottom line is, people are gonna believe whatever they wanna believe…
And most people will go seeking confirmation, for their pre-existing beliefs.
I’m gonna guess that you have a pre-existing belief is that Charlie Kirk actually got shot and killed,
and I also know that if you really wanted to, you could watch mainstream media all day long and they would confirm that belief every day for the next six weeks…
And then theres me…
I instantly knew the story was bullshit
Instantly.
As in the title headline sentence wasn’t even finished and I knew it was bullshit.
So I confess that I went looking for confirmation. I went looking for other people saying it was bullshit, and what do you know I found what I was looking for
“seek and ye shall find“
So what did i find?
Thousands of independent individuals (or a massive bot farm?)
And they were ALL calling BULLSHIT….
Think of it this way…
How many “primary sources” are for this story?
And when I say primary sources, I don’t mean a tweet from Donald Trump
I don’t mean a tweet from Benjamin Netanyahu
I don’t mean, CNN, who was not there at the scene
I don’t mean Fox News who is also probably not there at the scene
Pretty soon you don’t have very many actual sources on the ground,
but how many should you have?
There should’ve been a massive audience there right that’s what it showed on video?
Where are the thousand different camera views of this event?
I can tell you when I go to some event. I’m taking pictures. I’m taking video…
But even if you added up all the people that were at the event, all the people who supposedly were in the vicinity of this event,
all the people at the hospital (rabbit hole)
And even added in all of the supposed credible media, the credible influencers…
Still, the raw number of primary sources is under a few hundred…
Now compare that to the number of tweets on Twitter, calling bullshit
It’s not even comparable,
So let me put it to you this way…
Even if 100 people say 2+2=4
I still want to hear from that one guy who says it isn’t…
I want to understand his reasoning
I want to be able to think like he thinks
Maybe i am just one crazy guy on the internet?
But what if there were two crazy guys on the Internet, saying the same thing?
What if they were 100 crazy guys on the Internet, saying the same thing?
At what point do you stop and ask yourself what the heck is going on here?
Here is a link to Twitter search for Kirk hoax and a few other choice keywords
Sorted by live
Note the timestamps,
And the relative traffick,
Or time-between-posts
https://twitter.com/search?q=Kirk%20hoax%20OR%20Psyop%20OR%20fake%20OR%20crisis%20OR%20actor%20OR%20actors&src=typed_query&f=live
“3 men make 1 tiger”
chinese allegory