the boat owner story changed.

first it was, that he went out for a cigarette,

But then they changed the story and said he went out to walk the dog

This detail seems trivial at first, but it’s actually one of the pivotal moments in this entire story.

Whenever they do these narrative developments, the way they tell the story is that

Person X was doing Y, and thats when Z happened.

Where X is a supposed witness, who is necessary for the story plotline continuity

Where Y is some boring, mundane thing that most people can relate to,

And Z is the BIG SURPRISE that ties the storylines together

once you notice the formula template,

You can spot these fake witnesses from a mile away

This particular fake witness was “the boat owner”

And “the boat” was a critical part of the storyline

Actually, I think the boat owners story changed yet again,

And he said that he noticed a piece of foam had came loose from underneath the wrapper around his boat, and the foam was out in his yard,

So we went out and picked up the foam and he was putting it back under the cover of the boat and that’s when he noticed there was blood on the boat cover

That’s a whole Nother rabbit hole

I’ve got lots of pictures showing the boat cover with no blood on it

So clearly, the boat owner was not able to notice blood if there was no blood there

I have other pictures where there is blood on the boat fender

But that blood appears to have been planted as part of the scene,

Because I also have pictures of that boat fender with no blood on it

They spent about a week trying to explain and re-explain and re-explain this story because they’re narrative just was not adding up