π¨π¬π§ BREAKING: BRITONS CALL ON KING CHARLES TO DISSOLVE PARLIAMENT
π΄ Public demand a general election now
π΄ Trust in Starmer and Labour at rock bottom
π΄ Britain cannot survive 4 more years of this decline
SHOULD THE KING STEP IN AND DISSOLVE PARLIAMENT?
(twitter.com)
π π¦π¦π1π¦πππ¦π¦ π
Technically the King selects the government, and in doing this, has near unlimited power. In practice the monarch will select the electoral winner so long as their government continues to support the Crownβs grift (which they all do without question). They couldnβt care less about the day-to-day issues of actually governing, so the politicians do that.
They simply outsourced slavery.
With all due respect, this is an incredibly simplistic view of the UK system.
And no, 'technically' the King does NOT select the government. Like the US, the UK system of government evolved as a system of law and order. The King, or Monarch, is as subject to the (UK) law as Presidents Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama and Trump are.
But, let me ask you. Are Bush and Clinton really subject to the law? If not, why not? Is the problem here the US constitution? Or something else?
The basis for the US constitution AND the UK constitution is the same established foundation of common law. They differ, but there is a LOT more in common than there are differences.