U.S. is now shielding Pfizer. Feeling betrayed yet? You should
(open.substack.com)
🧐 WTF Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (118)
sorted by:
It can't work because the entire platform is flawed. Just like we first claimed in theory, which has now been proven, this tech changes DNA. Because of the scaled manufacturing process there is no way to clean out the genetic contamination. The entire idea is bad - unless of course the plan is to change human DNA.
Trump, like most of the public, does not understand the real science behind this technology. He has gotten very bad financially driven advice. This is one area where he is flat wrong. No one is perfect, but this platform is very destructive to life. I was hoping RFK would be able to talk some sense to him. But it appears he may be losing that battle. It would not be the first time Trump has caved to Pfizer. He did it in his first term sidelining RFK from the vaccine task force that Trump promised to give him. Bobby must be having flash backs.
Even if you want to try and say there is no way to get around the DNA modification period, that still leaves a whole realm of retroviruses, tumorous diseases, and autoimmune disorders that could potentially be treated with that "bug" in the tech.
Pfizer is the devil, don't throw out all of mRNA with it.
The mRNA platform as it currently exists is severely flawed. The biggest problem is in the manufacturing process. Genetic contamination gets in the final product and at scale there is no way to clean it up. The process of a fine tuned small batch product is very expensive to produce. That could cut down on the genetic contamination, but it still would not be targeted enough using vaccine delivery. That genetic material is rogue. There is no way that the vaccine or other current delivery systems can be controlled in where it ends up in the body. That is why there is such a wide spectrum of side effects. Besides, much of that sequence code is still not fully understood much less what it does. This tech requires years of study to answer all those questions, but these greedy bastards just want to make a quick buck and they don't care who gets hurt in the process and they certainly don't care about using the general public as Guinea Pigs. What good is it to try and cure one condition only to end up with another that could be much worse. Unknown unintended consequences have not been fully studied and exposed.
As far as autoimmune diseases are concerned, science doesn't even fully understand the mechanisms behind what causes autoimmunity much less how to fix it. Tumors, we have a better understanding. But the mRNA vaccines also turn these tumors into turbo tumors that are virtually untreatable. Retroviruses, if one believes that there is such a thing, mutate very quickly. Therefore, by the time a sequence is nailed down, the treatment will already be outdated by the time a treatment is produced. That is why vaccines against retroviruses have been pretty much a failure. DNA viruses are more stable and therefore can be treated more effectively. AI could speed up the process of development, but that still doesn't answer the other questions.
Frankly, we should not be messing with the basic genetic building blocks of life. It sounds good, but the devil is always in the details. Until they can better answer some of the challenges surrounding disease and its causes, jumping into rewriting our basic life code is fraught with danger and once that genie is let out of the bottle, there will be no putting it back in.
I am speaking as someone with a background in medical research and clinical practice. The tech was released way before it was ready. In the mean time, it needs to be stopped until it is better understood. Thousands, if not millions, have suffered because of this tech. We have already paid too high a price for the damage caused by vaccines of any kind. I am one of them. I will never trust the hair of the dog that bit me.
Thank you. Well said. Please post your thoughts on the clinical trials process. Often, trials are farmed out to “favorite” third parties to conduct. If the company, in this case Pfizer, is happy with the results then more clinical trials go their way. If they aren’t happy, it goes elsewhere next time. So in order to keep those multi million trials coming their way, those third parties know how to construct and engineer the trials to increase the odds for a favorable response.
Then the reports are written and submitted to the medical journals that are bloated with full page ads from these same drug companies. Without the ad revenue the journals cease to exist. So the editorial board considers which studies to include and which to reject. Is it any wonder that the only ones that see the light of day are those that find the drugs are well tolerated, show positive results, should be approved, etc?
The whole dam system is corrupt end to end IMHO. I’d love to read your thoughts.
Thank you. You seem to have a pretty good handle on how the whole process works and you hit the nails on their heads. I don't have much to add to what you so well summarized. Your conclusions are right on the money - pun intended.
The whole process was very frustrating and disheartening when I worked in research and later, clinical practice. What science should be researched for the good of humanity is sidelined for profit. If there is no pot of gold at the end of that rainbow there is no funding. The entire system was built and operated for profit - all the way down to the university lab level where you would think independent scientific research and education should take place. As you stated, major journals that are pumped out to front line professional providers, are filled with profit motivated biased studies that promote product A or method B. Then there is the brainwashing of the public mindset that reinforces the structure from the bottom up driven by big pharma though their media whores. The entire system has been designed and corrupted by special interests. Then there is the insurance industry that also drives part of that process to maximize profit at the expense of people's lives. Clinicians are forced into an even smaller box of acceptable extremely biased treatment modalities forced again by financial interests and not what is best for the patient. AI is adding a whole new dimension that is redefining medicine. Disease and its management are algorithmic results that have no need for the expertise of a human clinician. The results of that road may be a nightmarish page right out of a futuristic sci-fi novel. AI is an excellent tool when used as a tool. But when AI ends up in the driver's seat running the process and making the decisions, it will not end well for us as a species. Thank you for your response.