Note that the Prime Minister in Japan is not 'elected' via direct vote, like the US President, but rather becomes Prime Minister when he/she is made leader of the Party that is in power (has the majority of seats) in the parliament, or in the case of Japan, "the Diet".
So, it's all over except for the formality. Perhaps a US parallel is that the winner of the presidential election in November is the 'President-Elect', but not the President until sworn in in January.
It's how the world runs these days. It means nothing. It's all part of the game. Saving Israel for Last means that this dimension is defused and undone at the last steps of the process.
Observe Trump. He knows how to play 'the game' and works within their framework, all the while working to undo the satanic system behind the game.
They have had enough of the CCP infiltrating Japan. The current PM Daijin is pro Beijing. Takaichi has the support of the people. The Chinese are working in Japan illegally and driving down wages, overstaying visas, driving up property prices, manipulating politics, and overall behaving badly. They want the Chinese out of Japan!
This is what my very close Japanese relative says also. A lot of the politicians are CCP and DS controlled. Takaichi is apparently aware of this and is strongly positioned against it.
The Trump Effect.
Even better, she used to be a drummer in a rock band!
Japan I feel is waking up. They have really started cracking down on Chinese that are in the country illegally. They are waking up to the threat - much of it being driven by the citizens.
The country I am worried about is So Korea. The CCP has slowly been infiltrating there for years and the citizens for the most part are asleep. Although lately there have been demonstrations demanding to get the CCP out mostly by the youth. Their latest president is Beijing friendly. I think the election was stolen. The US has also underestimated the threat in So Korea - a huge security risk. The CCP has spread its reach all over the East. Many weaker countries are at serious risk which endangers everyone. The CCP is pure evil.
The gaslighting of “illegal immigrants” is so annoying. The public service enabled “legal” immigrants do just as much damage to a society, culturally and economically.
The vast majority of immigrants need to be deported, unless they are absolutely essential to the country, and then only given a temporary work visa.
Indians in particular are flooding every developed country, bringing their turd world attitudes and behaviour.
Within nature, as you put it, there are native and invasive species. Often the native species have adapted to their local environment over millennia, developing specific survival techniques based on unique conditions. They are in tune with nature, they contribute to the balance.
The introduction of an invasive species can be devastating as the native species cannot adapt quickly enough to the new challenger, who devours indiscriminately without thinking of any balance or order. The invasive species destroys the local environment, millennia of carefully balanced symbiotic relationships are destroyed.
The new arrival is only concerned with survival, nothing else. Native species are simply bred out of existence, the invasive species reproduces more due to not understanding the limitations of the environment, they are in a feeding frenzy.
Given time the environment also collapses due to the uncontrolled feeding frenzy. The invasive species then moves onto the next host environment and repeats the process.
This is what all forms of uncontrolled immigration, “legal” or illegal, is doing to the civilised world. It is a purposeful destruction of our way of life.
Within nature, as you put it, there are native and invasive species.
Species implies "specified" aka separated from one another aka nature separating each being within from one another, which makes each being a native within nature and a foreigner to one another.
A species cannot invade...only invite one another.
they contribute to the balance.
Con-tribute implies "together in tribes"...being within nature implies each ones choice within all balance, hence separated from one another.
Notice that the tribe in charge implies each "chosen one"...
The introduction of an invasive species
Inception implies the introduction of each "specific" being within nature. A being cannot introduce...only invite one another further in, hence invasion by invitation.
The origin of artificial introduction is called creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (something out of nothing). That's how the invaders use suggestion to tempt ones consent to give invitation.
cannot adapt quickly enough
If nature moves each living being from inception towards death, then quickening shortens life. What's the difference between adapting to nature (perception) and adapting to one another (suggestion)?
to the new
What if there cannot be anything new within nature...only the same for each difference within?
Could differences distract each other with likeness? Could a suggested "new" distract one from perceivable "now"?
millennia of carefully balanced
Millennia implies the taking of measurement by a being within nature aka taking and holding onto what is given in motion. That ain't balance, but ones choice imbalancing itself.
balanced symbiotic
Balance can only exist within motion...motion generates balance (momentum) to establish choice (matter). That's an analytical process...not a synthetic symbiosis.
In simpler...balance implies choice in-between sides. Symbiotic implies choice holding onto a side, which turns both sides together.
Others suggest symbolism to tempt ones consent into a symbiosis aka mass consensus.
feeding
What if nature (inception towards death) feeds upon being (life)? Why is it that no matter how much one eats...hunger returns? What if eating and drinking implies each beings adaptation to natures hunger and thirst? What if nature is self sustaining and thereby generates each being to sustain self like energy (internal/inherent power) does?
Given time the environment also collapses due to the uncontrolled feeding frenzy
If nature gives "time", then time controls any being within nature? What if few tempt many to take time, which in return ignores given?
repeats the process
What if process implies ongoing for each temporal potential within? What if only a potential within a process can experience repetition?
legal or illegal
What if legal implies natural law, and illegal each being within natural law?
What if few tempt many to turn against each other by choosing to hold onto a side aka legal versus illegal...could that turn one from natural law, and towards the artificial laws few shape to govern many?
purposeful destruction of our way of life
What if the only way (inception towards death) of life implies destruction aka division (de) of structure (struct) within action (ion)?
What if few suggest purpose to tempt many to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcomes?
What if life given to an off-spring implies by; within and in response to the process of dying? What if inception sentences life towards point of death? What if living implies a death sentence?
What if destruction implies analysis (reality), while construction implies synthesis (fiction)?
She’s not the Prime Minister yet last I looked. She’s the presumed front runner and likely winner though.
Apparently she’s even more of a hardliner than Shinzo Abe was.
I thought she got in?
She might have. I was under the impression they wouldn’t hold a formal election till like the 11th.
I could very much be wrong though. Or they may have moved up the timetable and done it sooner given the uncertainty in the geopolitical sphere.
Note that the Prime Minister in Japan is not 'elected' via direct vote, like the US President, but rather becomes Prime Minister when he/she is made leader of the Party that is in power (has the majority of seats) in the parliament, or in the case of Japan, "the Diet".
So, it's all over except for the formality. Perhaps a US parallel is that the winner of the presidential election in November is the 'President-Elect', but not the President until sworn in in January.
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3Mc3U2ZB.jpg
It's how the world runs these days. It means nothing. It's all part of the game. Saving Israel for Last means that this dimension is defused and undone at the last steps of the process.
Observe Trump. He knows how to play 'the game' and works within their framework, all the while working to undo the satanic system behind the game.
MJGA!
They have had enough of the CCP infiltrating Japan. The current PM Daijin is pro Beijing. Takaichi has the support of the people. The Chinese are working in Japan illegally and driving down wages, overstaying visas, driving up property prices, manipulating politics, and overall behaving badly. They want the Chinese out of Japan!
This is what my very close Japanese relative says also. A lot of the politicians are CCP and DS controlled. Takaichi is apparently aware of this and is strongly positioned against it.
The Trump Effect.
Even better, she used to be a drummer in a rock band!
Japan I feel is waking up. They have really started cracking down on Chinese that are in the country illegally. They are waking up to the threat - much of it being driven by the citizens.
The country I am worried about is So Korea. The CCP has slowly been infiltrating there for years and the citizens for the most part are asleep. Although lately there have been demonstrations demanding to get the CCP out mostly by the youth. Their latest president is Beijing friendly. I think the election was stolen. The US has also underestimated the threat in So Korea - a huge security risk. The CCP has spread its reach all over the East. Many weaker countries are at serious risk which endangers everyone. The CCP is pure evil.
I am sure they do.
The gaslighting of “illegal immigrants” is so annoying. The public service enabled “legal” immigrants do just as much damage to a society, culturally and economically.
The vast majority of immigrants need to be deported, unless they are absolutely essential to the country, and then only given a temporary work visa.
Indians in particular are flooding every developed country, bringing their turd world attitudes and behaviour.
Legal immigrant vs illegal immigrant tempts natives into an artificial conflict about good non-natives vs bad non-natives.
Within nature...each being represents a native, which is what others diminish by immigration (mixing).
Within nature, as you put it, there are native and invasive species. Often the native species have adapted to their local environment over millennia, developing specific survival techniques based on unique conditions. They are in tune with nature, they contribute to the balance.
The introduction of an invasive species can be devastating as the native species cannot adapt quickly enough to the new challenger, who devours indiscriminately without thinking of any balance or order. The invasive species destroys the local environment, millennia of carefully balanced symbiotic relationships are destroyed.
The new arrival is only concerned with survival, nothing else. Native species are simply bred out of existence, the invasive species reproduces more due to not understanding the limitations of the environment, they are in a feeding frenzy.
Given time the environment also collapses due to the uncontrolled feeding frenzy. The invasive species then moves onto the next host environment and repeats the process.
This is what all forms of uncontrolled immigration, “legal” or illegal, is doing to the civilised world. It is a purposeful destruction of our way of life.
Species implies "specified" aka separated from one another aka nature separating each being within from one another, which makes each being a native within nature and a foreigner to one another.
A species cannot invade...only invite one another.
Con-tribute implies "together in tribes"...being within nature implies each ones choice within all balance, hence separated from one another.
Notice that the tribe in charge implies each "chosen one"...
Inception implies the introduction of each "specific" being within nature. A being cannot introduce...only invite one another further in, hence invasion by invitation.
The origin of artificial introduction is called creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (something out of nothing). That's how the invaders use suggestion to tempt ones consent to give invitation.
If nature moves each living being from inception towards death, then quickening shortens life. What's the difference between adapting to nature (perception) and adapting to one another (suggestion)?
What if there cannot be anything new within nature...only the same for each difference within?
Could differences distract each other with likeness? Could a suggested "new" distract one from perceivable "now"?
Millennia implies the taking of measurement by a being within nature aka taking and holding onto what is given in motion. That ain't balance, but ones choice imbalancing itself.
Balance can only exist within motion...motion generates balance (momentum) to establish choice (matter). That's an analytical process...not a synthetic symbiosis.
In simpler...balance implies choice in-between sides. Symbiotic implies choice holding onto a side, which turns both sides together.
Others suggest symbolism to tempt ones consent into a symbiosis aka mass consensus.
What if nature (inception towards death) feeds upon being (life)? Why is it that no matter how much one eats...hunger returns? What if eating and drinking implies each beings adaptation to natures hunger and thirst? What if nature is self sustaining and thereby generates each being to sustain self like energy (internal/inherent power) does?
If nature gives "time", then time controls any being within nature? What if few tempt many to take time, which in return ignores given?
What if process implies ongoing for each temporal potential within? What if only a potential within a process can experience repetition?
What if legal implies natural law, and illegal each being within natural law?
What if few tempt many to turn against each other by choosing to hold onto a side aka legal versus illegal...could that turn one from natural law, and towards the artificial laws few shape to govern many?
What if the only way (inception towards death) of life implies destruction aka division (de) of structure (struct) within action (ion)?
What if few suggest purpose to tempt many to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcomes?
What if life given to an off-spring implies by; within and in response to the process of dying? What if inception sentences life towards point of death? What if living implies a death sentence?
What if destruction implies analysis (reality), while construction implies synthesis (fiction)?
Pil pul. Heard of it?
Wasn't my intention. I simply draw from anything that inspires, which fosters a lot of expression.
How about your thoughts about only this..."to be implies native within nature, while foreign to one another"?
Not just Indians, Somalians and a lot of others, right?
Thank God. I love her already!
Amen.
this is an upvote as it's at 17 now.
Amen.
In a nut shell she said Get the Fuck out and stay the fuck out you’re not welcome Thank You
Exactly, in a very polite way.
https://x.com/truckdriverpleb/status/1974490041993814480
I don't know what that mean.
Amen.
Female implies a soft core (soil); male implies a hard core (seed). The seed has it harder to penetrate the soil.
First (prime) male; then female; then child...a female cannot be primal, only a secondary derivative thereof.
Doubtful