Being going on for decades out of Tavistock, Fabians, Frankfurt School, UN, and all the other collections of cunts with 'Behavioural Science' teams. And remember the NYT article during NOvid (and IIRC not long after the Fauxlection) which brazenly and directly advised people not to think critically?
One of the chief reasons Q is anathema to them is because they can't interpret the 'riddles'.
One of their favorite tactics is to attack how you say something rather than the content of what you're saying. When that happens, I point it out to them, tell them I'm done talking to them, and walk away while they wail and gnash teeth.
Being going on for decades out of Tavistock, Fabians, Frankfurt School, UN, and all the other collections of cunts with 'Behavioural Science' teams. And remember the NYT article during NOvid (and IIRC not long after the Fauxlection) which brazenly and directly advised people not to think critically?
One of the chief reasons Q is anathema to them is because they can't interpret the 'riddles'.
Not only that, they cannot even think straight.
Excellent read.
Yeah.
The acceptance of ambiguity leading to chaotic thoughts, words and deeds.
Hello psychology. how are you today?
Not good. Howls.
Don't forget to mention RockyFelcher...
Don't know that one.
One of their favorite tactics is to attack how you say something rather than the content of what you're saying. When that happens, I point it out to them, tell them I'm done talking to them, and walk away while they wail and gnash teeth.
Amen. I have seen people on this board did the same b4.