Flynn, pardoned by trump, in the white house as we speak, is saying this? So, does Trump not know what happened? Did his administration let this happen for real? Are they not intelligent enough to have seen it coming and fake the plan? They let it happen? They're running a campaign with a narrative that us including Flynn doesn't agree with? In the same house as them? What's the plan here? To trust the plan?
If anyone's in on the plan, that were supposed to trust, it's Flynn. He literally spends half his time IN the white house.
Do you understand this?
This is a problem. Maybe the biggest this forum has seen.
I think we pretty much agree with Flynn here. It has been discussed ad nauseam. Something isn’t right about the official narrative on the Kirk assassination.
I disagree with your narrative on Flynn. Trump fired him almost a decade ago. I don’t put much stock into what Flynn has to say in particular and I don’t trust him in particular.
I still don’t trust the FBI to get to the truth and I don’t think Trump and Kash have them under control.
There is a lot of evidence that we aren’t privy to at the moment. We will just have to let things play out.
I'd like to strongly encourage you to avoid making generalizations about what "we" think, believe, or see.
It's far too easy to project one's experience on to the "we" that one personally identifies with.
Aside from that, personally, I think Flynn is very much on point here and I give a lot of stock in what Flynn says, pretty much always. I have reasons for that which I've mentioned elsewhere.
I tried to be careful to separate what I think “we” generally think about Charlie Kirk’s assassination and my(I) opinion on Flynn. I think it is fair to say, that for the most part, we think there is something fishy about the official narrative.
If there is a silent group that buys the official narrative, I don’t want them to feel ostracized from voicing it. I am still even open to this point of view and don’t want anyone to feel uncomfortable thinking that.
So far as my opinion on Flynn, I know that is not how we all feel. I don’t want to divide the sub on the subject. I can be persuaded to change my mind on him, and have done so many times over the last couple of years.
First, Charlie Kirk's assassination event undoubtedly has many layers.
One that may need exploring is the possibility of soft disclosure of falsified events on a mass scale. For those who just cannot believe that nine-one-one and countless others were staged productions, what better way to ease into it than be part of the event from the get-go (early shocking video) and be spoon fed the holes in the narrative subsequently?
Welp. Where's all the Q "fags" on this one?
Flynn, pardoned by trump, in the white house as we speak, is saying this? So, does Trump not know what happened? Did his administration let this happen for real? Are they not intelligent enough to have seen it coming and fake the plan? They let it happen? They're running a campaign with a narrative that us including Flynn doesn't agree with? In the same house as them? What's the plan here? To trust the plan?
If anyone's in on the plan, that were supposed to trust, it's Flynn. He literally spends half his time IN the white house.
Do you understand this?
This is a problem. Maybe the biggest this forum has seen.
I think we pretty much agree with Flynn here. It has been discussed ad nauseam. Something isn’t right about the official narrative on the Kirk assassination.
I disagree with your narrative on Flynn. Trump fired him almost a decade ago. I don’t put much stock into what Flynn has to say in particular and I don’t trust him in particular.
I still don’t trust the FBI to get to the truth and I don’t think Trump and Kash have them under control.
There is a lot of evidence that we aren’t privy to at the moment. We will just have to let things play out.
It's either 5555D chess...or......well......ummm......Occam's razor....
I'd like to strongly encourage you to avoid making generalizations about what "we" think, believe, or see.
It's far too easy to project one's experience on to the "we" that one personally identifies with.
Aside from that, personally, I think Flynn is very much on point here and I give a lot of stock in what Flynn says, pretty much always. I have reasons for that which I've mentioned elsewhere.
I tried to be careful to separate what I think “we” generally think about Charlie Kirk’s assassination and my(I) opinion on Flynn. I think it is fair to say, that for the most part, we think there is something fishy about the official narrative.
If there is a silent group that buys the official narrative, I don’t want them to feel ostracized from voicing it. I am still even open to this point of view and don’t want anyone to feel uncomfortable thinking that.
So far as my opinion on Flynn, I know that is not how we all feel. I don’t want to divide the sub on the subject. I can be persuaded to change my mind on him, and have done so many times over the last couple of years.
Thanks for the thoughtful response. Appreciated!
Rolling this one around in my head.
First, Charlie Kirk's assassination event undoubtedly has many layers.
One that may need exploring is the possibility of soft disclosure of falsified events on a mass scale. For those who just cannot believe that nine-one-one and countless others were staged productions, what better way to ease into it than be part of the event from the get-go (early shocking video) and be spoon fed the holes in the narrative subsequently?
Spit balling.
Um, I think this is literally not true. But if you have the receipts, I'm willing to learn.