A bullet fired from the distance they are claiming would have needed to be from a rifle with a scope in order to have the necessary accuracy
They aren't claiming tiny caliber like .22, which could have made an exit wound like we saw in the neck - they are claiming 30.06
A 30.06 rifle shot like they are claiming it was would have blown Charlie's head off, not made a neat little round hole in his neck - plus the gory splatter from the exit would would have been tough to miss
THEREFORE IT WASN'T THE GUY THEY SAID, SHOOTING FROM WHERE THEY SAID, USING THE GUN THEY SAID.
Also the two "security guards" behind Charlie were issuing very obvious, very unnatural hand signals, like a first-base coach, immediately before the fatal shot - the fact that this is not being investigated or even discussed speaks volumes
You don't touch the brim of your cap without moving or adjusting it; then touch the side of your nose without rubbing or scratching it; then stroke firmly down your upper arm with your other hand in one single deliberate downward stroke from your shoulder to your elbow, and then stop. No up and down. No scratch, no muscle rub, just a single, methodical stroke in one direction.
Obvious to all with observational power and critical thinking skills.
I once shot a deer from about 250 yards with a 3.06. When i skinned it you could see the damage to the rib cage. The exit wound was fist sized. The over pressure burst the heart with out even touching it. I lost the heart meat which i live grilled with onions and butter and the right side rib cage, and a fragment broke off and hit the should roast. Im surprised they think that was an ought six.
Exactly - they have to KNOW that we would know it couldn't have been that, even many who are without military experience; but they go with it anyway, and the FBI goes "Yup he used a bazooka to make a tiny hole, no splatter and no exit! Sure, this is no more credible than our assertion that the Trump shooting was just a random series of human errors by a hard-working USSS and FBI, but hey—you've bought THAT so far, so why not this??"
As creepy as they think Trump is, that is 1000 times creepier
A 30.06 rifle shot like they are claiming it was would have blown Charlie's head off, not made a neat little round hole in his neck - plus the gory splatter from the exit would would have been tough to miss
This is my number one reason that causes me to think that the lone gunman claim is false.
At the moment, my thinking is that none of the theories are correct and that all of them are part of the psyop to muddy the waters. I can’t keep from going back to the DC shooter. They had a heck of a time figuring those shootings out. It ended up being that one of the shooters hid in the trunk and shot through a hole in the trunk. When the crowd turned to see where the shot came from, there was just another inconspicuous car that no one paid much attention to. I think the bullet came from a similar type of situation where you could look around and look directly at the shooter and your mind immediately discounted them as a possibility.
Let's Review
A bullet fired from the distance they are claiming would have needed to be from a rifle with a scope in order to have the necessary accuracy
They aren't claiming tiny caliber like .22, which could have made an exit wound like we saw in the neck - they are claiming 30.06
A 30.06 rifle shot like they are claiming it was would have blown Charlie's head off, not made a neat little round hole in his neck - plus the gory splatter from the exit would would have been tough to miss
THEREFORE IT WASN'T THE GUY THEY SAID, SHOOTING FROM WHERE THEY SAID, USING THE GUN THEY SAID.
Also the two "security guards" behind Charlie were issuing very obvious, very unnatural hand signals, like a first-base coach, immediately before the fatal shot - the fact that this is not being investigated or even discussed speaks volumes
You don't touch the brim of your cap without moving or adjusting it; then touch the side of your nose without rubbing or scratching it; then stroke firmly down your upper arm with your other hand in one single deliberate downward stroke from your shoulder to your elbow, and then stop. No up and down. No scratch, no muscle rub, just a single, methodical stroke in one direction.
Obvious to all with observational power and critical thinking skills.
I once shot a deer from about 250 yards with a 3.06. When i skinned it you could see the damage to the rib cage. The exit wound was fist sized. The over pressure burst the heart with out even touching it. I lost the heart meat which i live grilled with onions and butter and the right side rib cage, and a fragment broke off and hit the should roast. Im surprised they think that was an ought six.
Exactly - they have to KNOW that we would know it couldn't have been that, even many who are without military experience; but they go with it anyway, and the FBI goes "Yup he used a bazooka to make a tiny hole, no splatter and no exit! Sure, this is no more credible than our assertion that the Trump shooting was just a random series of human errors by a hard-working USSS and FBI, but hey—you've bought THAT so far, so why not this??"
As creepy as they think Trump is, that is 1000 times creepier
This is my number one reason that causes me to think that the lone gunman claim is false.
At the moment, my thinking is that none of the theories are correct and that all of them are part of the psyop to muddy the waters. I can’t keep from going back to the DC shooter. They had a heck of a time figuring those shootings out. It ended up being that one of the shooters hid in the trunk and shot through a hole in the trunk. When the crowd turned to see where the shot came from, there was just another inconspicuous car that no one paid much attention to. I think the bullet came from a similar type of situation where you could look around and look directly at the shooter and your mind immediately discounted them as a possibility.