Maybe he didnt want a sample of his blood going to the democrats because you know it would. They use that blood only need a drop to show he committed some other crime. Why should he have to do that when he did nothing?
Where was E. Jean Carroll’s dress with the said DNA on it during the time between the alleged sexual abuse and her making the accusations? Was it in the custody of a police department somewhere? NO, IT WASN’T. Her claim is bullshit and everyone that has more than two brain cells to rub together knows it. If she had been sexually assaulted, she should have gone to the police and had a rape kit done.
Wasn’t the dress not even a style manufactured at the estimated time she claims this abuse happened? I vaguely remember reading something about the dress.
You mean the jury thought. And no, I don’t, there’s no telling who had access to Carroll’s dress and who has had access to DJT’s DNA. And no, it didn’t have to be sperm. You obviously have no idea about how DNA can be easily replicated and then placed at the scene of a crime. And since the dress in question had never been in police custody, which would require chain of custody documentation, there is no telling what type of bullshit could have been involved.
Why did the judge not allow the DNA sample that DJT’s legal team offered in 2023?
You’re obviously uninformed about the actual capabilities and uses of PCR and CRISPR.
Yeah, they did. The judge ruled incorrectly about evidence that was allowed to be presented. SCOTUS will toss the case and E Jean Carroll will get nothing.
Good, because an actual court decision is way tf overdue on this one. The court that handed down this one is a farce.
Lol apparently we had an idiot posting. Lots of deleted posts here 🙈
Maybe he didnt want a sample of his blood going to the democrats because you know it would. They use that blood only need a drop to show he committed some other crime. Why should he have to do that when he did nothing?
Where was E. Jean Carroll’s dress with the said DNA on it during the time between the alleged sexual abuse and her making the accusations? Was it in the custody of a police department somewhere? NO, IT WASN’T. Her claim is bullshit and everyone that has more than two brain cells to rub together knows it. If she had been sexually assaulted, she should have gone to the police and had a rape kit done.
Wasn’t the dress not even a style manufactured at the estimated time she claims this abuse happened? I vaguely remember reading something about the dress.
You mean the jury thought. And no, I don’t, there’s no telling who had access to Carroll’s dress and who has had access to DJT’s DNA. And no, it didn’t have to be sperm. You obviously have no idea about how DNA can be easily replicated and then placed at the scene of a crime. And since the dress in question had never been in police custody, which would require chain of custody documentation, there is no telling what type of bullshit could have been involved.
Why did the judge not allow the DNA sample that DJT’s legal team offered in 2023? You’re obviously uninformed about the actual capabilities and uses of PCR and CRISPR.
Unless they stole some of his DNA.
No. Those mofos could easily steal some. Bribe the NY cleaning lady and steal a hair off his comb or brush in his apartment.
Yeah, they did. The judge ruled incorrectly about evidence that was allowed to be presented. SCOTUS will toss the case and E Jean Carroll will get nothing.
You mean SCOTUS, c’mon Bluesky, get it straight.