In all those posts put together, if you strip out all the grandstanding, exclaiming and soundbites and showmanship type white noise and repetition, there is really just a small amount of info being presented. I have no idea why it was presented so very poorly (gaming the monetization aspect of twitter maybe?) but essentially in just a couple lines it seems to say:

• the story of her crash/disappearance is not what we were told
• she was primarily conducting surveillance of Japanese military targets over a large expanse of ocean, relevant to their force projection and naval posture buildup prior to the outbreak of ww2.
• she likely vanished for reasons associated with this military mission - shot down, arrested, interrogated, executed. Like a spy would be in any other contact between hostile parties.
• a lot of $ has been spent on trying to find her plane by US milint parties, which is an indicator of the true purpose of the flight, and are likely done to conceal the military nature of her mission, maintain the hoax story, and to retrieve any surviving film canisters, records, tapes, equipment and so on.
• there are unaccountable classifications applied to her records, another indicator that her purpose was not civilian.

Simple. I dont know why the elaborate series of silly posts were used for something so clear in hindsight, but thats my 2c.