We actually have to have the Muslim religion and all of it's supporters deported. This is, Muslim, not so much a religion as a law the people that follow it can use to eradicate all of us and more. We can not, and should not, let be Muslims be free in America!
A good number of these folks are illegal immigrants - either by crossing the border illegally or by lying on their entry papers. Cracking down on this would solve at least a portion of this problem.
The two things are linked, so we likely could if the people started understanding what the constitution actually says, and what judgments would be involved in doing so.
The constitution is rooted in a moral framework based on the Bible. While there should not be a state established church of which there is a head within the state, asserting that one religious worldview is not compatible with another is not beyond the pale.
Think of it this way, if someone’s religion involved eating people in the middle of the street, we would have no qualms with enforcing the law against that, yes? Yet that is explicitly only capable of being done by Congress or some subject of the constitution explicitly having a law against an establishment of religion. Yet nobody would have an issue with it, and would rightly call the religion wrong. We have enforced law against several religions.
If we look at it earnestly, the fundamental things that prevent us declaring Islam incompatible with our country are likely numbers, money, international trade dependencies, and gaslighting.
We actually have to have the Muslim religion and all of it's supporters deported. This is, Muslim, not so much a religion as a law the people that follow it can use to eradicate all of us and more. We can not, and should not, let be Muslims be free in America!
Due to the First Amendment we can not make it about Islam.
However, we CAN make it about Sharia law because Sharia is incompatible with the Constitution.
A good number of these folks are illegal immigrants - either by crossing the border illegally or by lying on their entry papers. Cracking down on this would solve at least a portion of this problem.
Agreed, and it can't happen soon enough.
The two things are linked, so we likely could if the people started understanding what the constitution actually says, and what judgments would be involved in doing so.
The constitution is rooted in a moral framework based on the Bible. While there should not be a state established church of which there is a head within the state, asserting that one religious worldview is not compatible with another is not beyond the pale.
Think of it this way, if someone’s religion involved eating people in the middle of the street, we would have no qualms with enforcing the law against that, yes? Yet that is explicitly only capable of being done by Congress or some subject of the constitution explicitly having a law against an establishment of religion. Yet nobody would have an issue with it, and would rightly call the religion wrong. We have enforced law against several religions.
If we look at it earnestly, the fundamental things that prevent us declaring Islam incompatible with our country are likely numbers, money, international trade dependencies, and gaslighting.
The Constitution is the highest law in the land.
Sharia would attempt to preempt it.
This is sedition.
It's that simple. Anyone who follows, or advocates others follow, Sharia is seditious or part of a seditious conspiracy. Get rid of them.
Edit: Note that I am keeping my position here entirely secular. I am a Christian and I recognize the Biblical (or Deist) roots of our Constitution.
True, you stated it better than I did but that is what I meant when I said the Muslim religion is their entire lives. Thanks.
I agree. It's not a religion.