Q pretty explicitly pegged Snowden as a traitor who was trying to sabotage the NSA's monitoring of deep state actors on behalf of the CIA. Likewise, Q explicitly called AJ a Mossad controlled op. Disinfo is necessary = tossing out bogus "it's happening ____!" when in fact it was not habbening, causing the deep state to over-react and show their hand, burn ammo, etc.
Exposing false patriots was not covered under disinfo necessary, unless you can show me someone Q called out that turned out to be ourguy.
Poso, Cernovich, AJ, Snowden, Jack Dorsey, Comey, and on and on. At the very best, some of them could have been pressured into acting on behalf of the patriots, and others could have had their puppet strings cut and didn't start out as traitors. I leave room for that but for someone like AJ or Snowden, I mean I've got the biggest grains of salt you can buy for any of their moves in this chess game.
You say he woke you up, great, but consider that was his job, only to siphon you into a crazy kennel in some corner of the game board. Would you still have warm fuzzies?
AJ was allowed to operate and flourish for decades while Bill Cooper got raided and executed right after he accurately predicted 9/11. Go see what Bill had to say about AJ long before Q.
AJ woke me, too, but I soon dumped him because I couldn't stand the pretend anger outbursts and shouting. Regardless of the sometimes useful information, I couldn't bear to listen and watch.
I’m ok. Again, it might seem like Q was super clear to you, but I still remember “trust Wray, trust x, y, and z.” Now I’m still waiting on those assurances to pan out and I’m still open to it, but Q is hardly straightforward and transparent in those posts on matters like that. Which frankly, is why I appreciate them so much. Take them too much at face value and you end up with egg on your face. As they’re written they force critical thinking. Maybe all of it’s true, but not yet, maybe some of it was deliberately untrue, and always will be, by design. Whatever the breakdown on that is, I’m not worried about it. But I always worry when I see someone as sure as themselves on matters like this as you seem to be. I try to avoid that myself. I’ll take your strong opinion on it under advisement though. Can’t hurt to consider.
Critical thinking and analysis of AJ's direction throughout the years coupled with Bill Cooper's statements and Q's posts about him form my total picture. Snowden is a different, more deliberate beast entirely. AJ is that "approved unapproved spokesman with Mossad ties" your mama warned you about.
Trusting Sessions and Wray is checkers, as all we have are a few moves to base our conclusions on. AJ has a 30+ year track record of steering anyone seeking the real story into x, y, z, on behalf of n. Gatekeeper controlled opposition couldn't be more well-defined
Q pretty explicitly pegged Snowden as a traitor who was trying to sabotage the NSA's monitoring of deep state actors on behalf of the CIA. Likewise, Q explicitly called AJ a Mossad controlled op. Disinfo is necessary = tossing out bogus "it's happening ____!" when in fact it was not habbening, causing the deep state to over-react and show their hand, burn ammo, etc.
Exposing false patriots was not covered under disinfo necessary, unless you can show me someone Q called out that turned out to be ourguy.
Poso, Cernovich, AJ, Snowden, Jack Dorsey, Comey, and on and on. At the very best, some of them could have been pressured into acting on behalf of the patriots, and others could have had their puppet strings cut and didn't start out as traitors. I leave room for that but for someone like AJ or Snowden, I mean I've got the biggest grains of salt you can buy for any of their moves in this chess game.
You say he woke you up, great, but consider that was his job, only to siphon you into a crazy kennel in some corner of the game board. Would you still have warm fuzzies?
AJ was allowed to operate and flourish for decades while Bill Cooper got raided and executed right after he accurately predicted 9/11. Go see what Bill had to say about AJ long before Q.
AJ woke me, too, but I soon dumped him because I couldn't stand the pretend anger outbursts and shouting. Regardless of the sometimes useful information, I couldn't bear to listen and watch.
real patriots never ragebait, they calculate
I’m ok. Again, it might seem like Q was super clear to you, but I still remember “trust Wray, trust x, y, and z.” Now I’m still waiting on those assurances to pan out and I’m still open to it, but Q is hardly straightforward and transparent in those posts on matters like that. Which frankly, is why I appreciate them so much. Take them too much at face value and you end up with egg on your face. As they’re written they force critical thinking. Maybe all of it’s true, but not yet, maybe some of it was deliberately untrue, and always will be, by design. Whatever the breakdown on that is, I’m not worried about it. But I always worry when I see someone as sure as themselves on matters like this as you seem to be. I try to avoid that myself. I’ll take your strong opinion on it under advisement though. Can’t hurt to consider.
Critical thinking and analysis of AJ's direction throughout the years coupled with Bill Cooper's statements and Q's posts about him form my total picture. Snowden is a different, more deliberate beast entirely. AJ is that "approved unapproved spokesman with Mossad ties" your mama warned you about.
Trusting Sessions and Wray is checkers, as all we have are a few moves to base our conclusions on. AJ has a 30+ year track record of steering anyone seeking the real story into x, y, z, on behalf of n. Gatekeeper controlled opposition couldn't be more well-defined