Don't you know by now that there are only a limited number of ways to properly view what Candace is doing if you want to be considered an elite researcher?

I think I have it down. To be an elite researcher with regards to Candace you need to realize that she is:

• a) just a grifter going after money and clicks or

• b) not very bright. Couldn't possibly be on the same level as an elite researcher. For example, she has no idea how Israel is just a pawn to the real dark power elites. or

-c) is a black hat intentionally trying to divide MAGA and therefore render it powerless and meaningless.

I'm probably missing some, but I think that covers the biggest acceptable elite researcher views on Candace.

Here's a thought from someone who (I think like you) actually takes in all her YouTube content - maybe she's sincere in being devasted by Charlie's public assassination, and, as arguably his best friend in the world, will stop at nothing to expose who was responsible with the hope of bringing them to justice. Sorry if you're at risk of having your IQ lowered by considering this possibility.

Multiple things can be true at the same time. The Jews are pawns crowd I don't think realize that most of us here get that. A healthy debate could be had over the British Empire or the Vatican (or something else) at the top. The real point is the top is Satanic and demonic (like The Watchers, etc.).

I happen to think it's Rome and the Vatican. Wait, what?!?!? How can I say that and also be a fan of what Candace is doing? Because I can walk and chew gum at the same time. I think she is very good at detailed research and is spot on at exposing a lot of things (psychology, MKUltra, Freemason origins of the USA, the EVIL French Revolution - meaning the Bolsheviks, and other things we can't discuss here without getting banned).

Yes, I think a lot of people could learn a lot from Candace's research, but I disagree with her about the Catholic Church. I think it's at the heart of the beast system (NOT individual Catholics). I know she embraces Catholicism whole heartedly so (to use a fish metaphor) I have to "take in the meat and set aside the bones".

I also don't rule out the possibility that Charlie could be alive. There was a trap door to an underground tunnel after all in front of where he was speaking and obscured from the crowd's view, no blood coming from whoever was being carried to the SUV, etc. The people who say they KNOW that's true I would argue don't know that for certain. They're speculating based on what they see as the most logical interpretation of all the information surrounding the event and how it relates to everything else going on in the world. They still don't know for certain unless they were told firsthand by those carrying out the "fake death" (which they weren't).

Okay, end of rant. Felt good to get that off my chest.