From what I've seen, Candace Owens was the first and loudest noticer to point out the possible connections between Israel and Charlie Kirk's assassination.
Candace could very well be a shill too. But She's making Zion haters so fast it would make Hitler blush.
she plays for the same team as Nick. I call them the Theocratic-Right. And trust me, they are antithetical to anything Free or Constitutional; and needless to say, enemies of the Gospel of Christ Jesus, though they profess to adhere to it.
I don't believe Candace is a shill. She's been through the game, she was probably funded a while by them but has since broke off on her own. Im actually loving her digging into the Charkie Kirk murder and I think there is a lot of explaining to do by TPUSA and the maroon shirt boys who all look like ROTC. They dont even want to investigate and that just makes it sketchy. While I might not believe everything she said in her former years, I do think this assassination woke her the F up, and I loved that she was exposing the DuPonts.
I feel the same about Tucker.
I do agree with you on Fuentess. Hes definitely being propped up by something since he just came out of no where to me. I follow guys like Jordan Sather and George Webb and they dont get even close to the #s after a decade of being in media. That to me says that some organizations choose to push others and prop up their views to look more popular. Sather did a nice exposure of Fuentess and his dirty ass mind. But he hasn't given me much reason to follow. IMO, just another talker, doesn't go too deep, doesn't provide research, and I really cant find why so many like him.
These days I look for research and indepth analysis of events and organizations. Candace is doing that now. I feel these guys like Fuentess just want to keep us on the current events and never want us to dig and research further and we are wasting time trying to figure out whose "real" or not, IMO, if they arent giving indepth research and analysis with dot connections than they are a waste of time for me regardless of who it is.
“Wait, so you’re saying that shills might fight with other shills in public?”
From what I've seen, Candace Owens was the first and loudest noticer to point out the possible connections between Israel and Charlie Kirk's assassination.
Candace could very well be a shill too. But She's making Zion haters so fast it would make Hitler blush.
she plays for the same team as Nick. I call them the Theocratic-Right. And trust me, they are antithetical to anything Free or Constitutional; and needless to say, enemies of the Gospel of Christ Jesus, though they profess to adhere to it.
I don't believe Candace is a shill. She's been through the game, she was probably funded a while by them but has since broke off on her own. Im actually loving her digging into the Charkie Kirk murder and I think there is a lot of explaining to do by TPUSA and the maroon shirt boys who all look like ROTC. They dont even want to investigate and that just makes it sketchy. While I might not believe everything she said in her former years, I do think this assassination woke her the F up, and I loved that she was exposing the DuPonts.
I feel the same about Tucker.
I do agree with you on Fuentess. Hes definitely being propped up by something since he just came out of no where to me. I follow guys like Jordan Sather and George Webb and they dont get even close to the #s after a decade of being in media. That to me says that some organizations choose to push others and prop up their views to look more popular. Sather did a nice exposure of Fuentess and his dirty ass mind. But he hasn't given me much reason to follow. IMO, just another talker, doesn't go too deep, doesn't provide research, and I really cant find why so many like him.
These days I look for research and indepth analysis of events and organizations. Candace is doing that now. I feel these guys like Fuentess just want to keep us on the current events and never want us to dig and research further and we are wasting time trying to figure out whose "real" or not, IMO, if they arent giving indepth research and analysis with dot connections than they are a waste of time for me regardless of who it is.