In a state elections issue - probably not. However this affected a national election and Colorados corruption of the vote negates the votes of the rest of the 49 states. Depriving a voter within the state of the integrity of their vote in a state election, IS A CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION OF THE CITIZENS IN THAT STATE by the government of the state.
In a national election, IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE REST OF US by dilution of our vote. This means of jurisdiction for the DOJ
The right to a clean voting and electoral process is a civil right. Ultimately depriving a citizen of that civil right removes their existence before the state. The ONLY recourse then becomes the Second Ammendment
this is an interesting Constitutional argument, can the President of the USA pardon someone convicted of a crime against one of the States?
key points from letter to Pres. Trump, care of the Pardon Attorney
from
Atty. Peter Ticktin, counsel for Tina P.
When the founders, writers & adopters of the Constitution created the power to pardon, The United States was considered even up until after the Civil War to be “various countries or states which had become united.”
example: Art. 3 section 3 paragraph 3 Treason of the United Statesn = levying war against them (notice it does not sayagainst it!)
The federal, national Constitution uses language still speaking of the States as “them” and “their.”
Atty. Ticktin continues: “[I]t does not make sense that they intended to give the individual states the power to circumvent the President’s power to pardon.”
____ comment: this is an interesting argument by Atty. Ticktin, and if the President does have the power to pardon persons convicted of crimes against one of the States, then Pardon Attorney please recommend ASAP that President Trump do so.
the pardon power is in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: “The President…and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States….”
Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist and supporter of a strong national government, is the Founder who proposed the power to pardon. We do not have any suggestion# that this power included the ability to pardon someone convicted for an offense against one of the States.
Those of us who watched the Tina Peters trials know that the charges against her were scoped such that she was not allowed to present her case.
Thinking about God's divine justice, I give praise to Him that He is All-knowing and His Holy Spirit of Truth prevails in all His judgement. All encompassing Truth, not narrowly constructed lawfare.
The State of Colorado violated Tina Peters civil rights, because the judge prevented evidence from being admitted, thus not letting the jury to decide on it's veracity. And her defense was castrated because of it.
Besides that, how is a citizen of the USA, let alone Colorado, going to be judged honestly by a jury of peers brainwashed by the Colorado intrinsic skullduggery system?
And her attorneys couldn't appeal this in a Federal District Court, no doubt because Peters could not afford the attorney fees.
And that District Court might be rigged too.
If there every was a raw deal, this is it.
Fuck all that. Somehow the DOJ should come to her rescue under federal civil rights violations? I mean when justice fails, there are Constitutional protections to go to a higher level court, up to the Supreme Court. Right? Where are all the deep pockets that can help her out. What is the holdup?
In a state elections issue - probably not. However this affected a national election and Colorados corruption of the vote negates the votes of the rest of the 49 states. Depriving a voter within the state of the integrity of their vote in a state election, IS A CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION OF THE CITIZENS IN THAT STATE by the government of the state.
In a national election, IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE REST OF US by dilution of our vote. This means of jurisdiction for the DOJ
The right to a clean voting and electoral process is a civil right. Ultimately depriving a citizen of that civil right removes their existence before the state. The ONLY recourse then becomes the Second Ammendment
this is an interesting Constitutional argument, can the President of the USA pardon someone convicted of a crime against one of the States?
key points from letter to Pres. Trump, care of the Pardon Attorney
from
Atty. Peter Ticktin, counsel for Tina P.
When the founders, writers & adopters of the Constitution created the power to pardon, The United States was considered even up until after the Civil War to be “various countries or states which had become united.”
example: Art. 3 section 3 paragraph 3 Treason of the United Statesn = levying war against them (notice it does not say against it!)
The federal, national Constitution uses language still speaking of the States as “them” and “their.”
Atty. Ticktin continues: “[I]t does not make sense that they intended to give the individual states the power to circumvent the President’s power to pardon.”
____ comment: this is an interesting argument by Atty. Ticktin, and if the President does have the power to pardon persons convicted of crimes against one of the States, then Pardon Attorney please recommend ASAP that President Trump do so.
the pardon power is in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: “The President…and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States….”
Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist and supporter of a strong national government, is the Founder who proposed the power to pardon. We do not have any suggestion# that this power included the ability to pardon someone convicted for an offense against one of the States.
Nevertheless, do it, and Free Tina Peters!
https://nitter.net/PatrickByrne/status/1997911652147060840#m
Free Tina. The charges have always been horseshit.
Those of us who watched the Tina Peters trials know that the charges against her were scoped such that she was not allowed to present her case.
Thinking about God's divine justice, I give praise to Him that He is All-knowing and His Holy Spirit of Truth prevails in all His judgement. All encompassing Truth, not narrowly constructed lawfare.
The State of Colorado violated Tina Peters civil rights, because the judge prevented evidence from being admitted, thus not letting the jury to decide on it's veracity. And her defense was castrated because of it.
Besides that, how is a citizen of the USA, let alone Colorado, going to be judged honestly by a jury of peers brainwashed by the Colorado intrinsic skullduggery system?
And her attorneys couldn't appeal this in a Federal District Court, no doubt because Peters could not afford the attorney fees.
And that District Court might be rigged too.
If there every was a raw deal, this is it.
Fuck all that. Somehow the DOJ should come to her rescue under federal civil rights violations? I mean when justice fails, there are Constitutional protections to go to a higher level court, up to the Supreme Court. Right? Where are all the deep pockets that can help her out. What is the holdup?
Come on man Dominion brand equipment are fool proof. Satire