This probably violates the rule about giving sufficient time before commenting or forming a conclusion, but the Tina Peters travesty is something I have been watching since the day she was unjustly convicted. I have been waiting patiently while an old woman who did nothing wrong wasted away in a miserable confinement, with nobody doing anything until Trump pardoned her, and there she is, still in prison. I’ve done enough silent waiting. My trust is being tested in a way that breaks my heart.
This is a big deal, not just in terms of the injustice it represents, but because of the perception it will likely create of the President and his administration not being able (or perhaps not willing) to enforce his lawful domestic orders. I think I can pretty confidently say that no amount of gung-ho Venezuelan drug-boat sinking or well-deserved Euro-tyrant power-slapping is going to help the President’s image if Tina Peters dies mysteriously in prison. That will become a stain on the back of the President’s pants that no amount of MAGA-strength multi-generational Tide will wash away because she is a central iconic figure in this whole stolen 2020 election mess, possibly the central iconic figure, and what’s been done to her is every bit as cruel and outrageous as what the Democrats did to the J6ers.
I believe, with all due respect, that the President needs to stomp his foot down and put an end to this wonton rebellion from Colorado officials. Don’t let it drag out another minute. There is no secret about the reason Tina Peters is in prison. Corrupt officials in Colorado needed to shut her up and make an example of her so others in their state would be afraid to tell on them, even though all their dirty secrets are already out in the open, and everybody knows what they did. Now they’re trying to use this to make Trump and his administration look like wimpy fools, as if there is no difference after all between them and the dynastic rich Republicans and treasonous RINOs in congress who do nothing but hold endless hearings, pretending they mean to get to the bottom of things while doing everything they can to preserve the sweet lucrative uniparty deal they have with the Democrats: “Say whatever you want to look patriotic and righteous as long as you don’t do anything to hinder our leftist domestic agenda. In exchange we won’t do anything meaningful to stop your foreign wars and insurrections, your forever conflicts based on ancient grudges, or your NGO coups that depose elected leaders in favor of dictators whom you think are better for democracy.”
Now the Colorado political machine will use tortured legal reasoning try to run out the clock, which means keeping Tina Peters in prison and suffering in ill health until she dies, or make her die quicker by the hand of a bribed fellow inmate or corrupt psychotic prison guard. It’s all deliberate, and I wouldn’t be opposed to the President deliberately sending in the military to surround the prison to get her out with extreme prejudice, and then arrest the prison officials who are defying presidential authority. Guantanamo for them. Federalize the prison if you have to, just do SOMETHING with some TEETH.
Having said that, I do trust President Trump. I understand there are timing issues to these things and that the president is committed to doing everything lawfully, but time is running out, law no longer exists as anything but tyrannical oppression in Colorado. If Pam Bondi doesn’t start arresting somebody of note (and not cosmetically slapping the hands of one or two less well-known offenders just to please the voting base), it’s going to erode all the trust and goodwill the President has built up in his supporters from being the only president in living memory who actually kept his promises. Perhaps it’s not fair that things can work out like that, particularly in light of the sheer volume of stunning things Trump has already accomplished, but they often do, and it’s probably going to happen in this case if it isn’t soon brought to a just resolution. People are paying attention to this, Mr. President. Find a way, and find it quickly.
One caveat: If I’m wrong, if tomorrow the President and his administration reveal a brilliant plan to get Tina Peters out of prison by Wednesday, I’ll apologize without feeling bad about my outrage over law-abiding American citizens being put in prison by vindictive soulless Democrats and kept there because distracted soulless Republicans will do nothing.
There is precedent for this. Felons have been pulled from state prisons and put in WP while US Attorneys pursued Mafia related RICO charges. I have to do some digging to cite a case, but I’m sure, given some time, I would find one.
People keep bringing up Mafia/RICO cases as if that proves something magical here, but that’s not what actually happened in those situations.
Yes, inmates have been temporarily pulled from state custody to cooperate or testify in federal cases. That part is real. What didn’t happen is them being whisked away into witness protection to live free while their sentence just…vanished.
In those cases, they were interviewed, sometimes testified, and then sent right back to prison to finish their sentence. Any benefit came later, through formal sentence reductions, plea deals, or clemency — after charges, after prosecutions, after courts were involved. Witness protection does not replace a conviction or pause a sentence.
And the biggest missing piece here: those cases had actual federal indictments. Named defendants. Active RICO prosecutions. DOJ filings. Court dockets. None of that exists here. There is no federal case Tina Peters is a witness to.
So even if you accept the Mafia precedent, it proves the opposite of what people think. At best, cooperation means temporary movement and protective custody — not freedom, not relocation, and definitely not “living her best life under witness protection.”
Conflating those things is how this keeps turning into fantasy law instead of reality.
There is no such case for Peters to be a witness for.
You realize that, right? That those terms are for real things and there are actual laws that are involved and it's not based on feels and wishes and what people think should happen.
So if there's not an actual, real federal case that Peters would actually be needed as a witness for, then it's just magical wishful thinking.
And if she needs to be a witness, then they just take her out of jail for the day or however long her testimony lasts.
I think you guys have been watching too many movies and have some vague notion that she's going to get a new identity and a cute little house out in the suburbs somewhere and then gets to just get out of her prison sentence that way.
POTUS has publicly stated that a lot of evidence of the 2020 Big Steal would be released this week. Tina Peters can be a material witness in the Colorado shenanigans.
Great. Way past due. But the actual case has to be built first. You realize that, right? And even then her being a witness isn't a full time thing. If they need info from her, they go to the prison and ask her questions there. If she needs to testify in court (again, this would need an actual real case) then she gets pulled out of prison to testify. It shouldn't take more than a couple days to testify.
What exactly do you think a material witness does that they would need to be released from prison full time for, exactly?
To be continued…
I’m going to wait and see what information drops this week.