That really was exactly my point. Honestly, I deliberately stay out of these convos but read them all because I don't have a solid opinion on this one. There is sooooo much disinfo with this subject.
It’s funny how when someone wants to “pick a side”, questioning that side almost instinctively puts the questioner “on the other side” when the truth is almost always at Point C that nobody is at, and a lot of the effective people who insist on challenging both sides get killed.
“I think you murdered Jane.”
“I was very provably on the other side of the country when she died.”
“Well if you didn’t murder her who did?”
“I don’t know.”
“If you don’t have an alternative, I’m going to continue believing it’s you.”
Alinsky totally had that pegged right. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”
Not because it’s the right answer, but because people are retarded and insist on having an answer, even if there isn’t one.
That really was exactly my point. Honestly, I deliberately stay out of these convos but read them all because I don't have a solid opinion on this one. There is sooooo much disinfo with this subject.
It’s funny how when someone wants to “pick a side”, questioning that side almost instinctively puts the questioner “on the other side” when the truth is almost always at Point C that nobody is at, and a lot of the effective people who insist on challenging both sides get killed.
Alinsky totally had that pegged right. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”
Not because it’s the right answer, but because people are retarded and insist on having an answer, even if there isn’t one.
Well said fren.