Where is this at? When I click the link its just an Instagram post singing that he is in the files. Has anyone gone to the actual files and found whatever Asusundevils is talking about??
The link he posted actually explains why Ransome is not credible. This is the opening part of the document:
The Emails will demonstrate that Ms. Ransome’s inflammatory, salacious, and defamatory testimony
concerning the Intervenor and others is false and that the deponent is not credible. Absent this
relief, Ms. Ransome’s unrebutted testimony will gravely prejudice Intervenor by publishing
deliberate lies calculated to harm his reputation.
Right now, when it comes to EF, we have to only go by what has receipts. Thats the point of releasing the documents. Nothing without records should be believed.
And its okay that things are redacted. Demons will scream their heads off until everything is unredacted, and we just wait for that. If nothing was redacted they wouldn't have anything to scream about and they would scream about.
Where is this at? When I click the link its just an Instagram post singing that he is in the files. Has anyone gone to the actual files and found whatever Asusundevils is talking about??
The link he posted actually explains why Ransome is not credible. This is the opening part of the document:
Thank you. I saw that and realized quickly that this is likely disinformation
Right now, when it comes to EF, we have to only go by what has receipts. Thats the point of releasing the documents. Nothing without records should be believed.
And its okay that things are redacted. Demons will scream their heads off until everything is unredacted, and we just wait for that. If nothing was redacted they wouldn't have anything to scream about and they would scream about.
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf
thanks.
No problem!!