Reference Point:
Promethean Update - They Lied About Turning Point: Vance Exposes the REAL Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7Qdppy5xNQ
Highly recommended.
A lot of what the Promethean ladies say makes a lot of sense to me.
So, I decided to ask Grok what it thought about the significance of TPUSA in the re-election of Donald Trump in 2024.
https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=2003333876006203420
"How significant do you think the work or action of TPUSA was in the election of Donald Trump in 2024?"
"Turning Point USA (TPUSA), founded by Charlie Kirk, played a notable role in Donald Trump's 2024 presidential victory, particularly through its focus on youth mobilization, voter turnout efforts, and grassroots organizing in key swing states."
Key Contributions:
Youth Voter Engagement and Turnout
Ground Game and Voter Mobilization
Alliance with Trump and MAGA Ecosystem
ON that last point:
TPUSA evolved from a campus group into a major Trump ally, providing infrastructure for rallies, endorsements, and post-election lobbying (e.g., pushing for Trump's cabinet picks). Their efforts built on work since 2016, though 2020 was a setback; by 2024, they were seen as a "powerful grassroots machine."
I tend to focus more on the psyop/anon-level of information, so I never paid much attention to TPUSA or Charlie Kirk, as they were/are decidedly more mainstream. But, they have been thrust directly into the 'truther' space, overlapping anon space, but the recent developments, including the rise of 'controversy' in the aftermath of the Kirk murder.
However, if you step back and look at the bigger picture, a lot of things make sense. I.e. the intense attack on TPUSA, starting with the murder of Charlie Kirk. The targeting of the youth sector, particularly the young men.
While certain inflooencers proclaim they are "America First" and "Conservative", even well, 'Trump Supporters', their underlying messages are consistently 'do not trust Trump', 'the Administration has gone wrong/cannot be trusted', etc.
In my opinion, it's exceedingly important to be able to step back from the chaotic fighting and criticizing and attacking, and consider other potential explanations for how certain actors are behaving.
Trump needs the People on his side but also the Congress on his side going forward. The mid-terms are going to be a critical battle.
How would the opponents of Trump see TPUSA and Charlie Kirk? As an organization that MUST be stopped? At all costs?
Easy to imagine.
This Promethean Update goes into a lot of this, but for me the key and salient point she emphasizes is one I would like to continually impress upon all the frogs gathering at the GAW waterhole (quoting William Sargent's 1957 book "Battle for the mind":
Various types of belief can be implanted in many people, after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger or excitement. Of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgement and heightened suggestibility.
Its various group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of “herd instinct,” and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics, and in all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility.”
heightened suggestibility
wartime, epidemics (boy, did he call that one)
fear, anger or excitement
For anons, the last one is really important. Because most of us have broken free of the mainstream matrix, but we are very much being targeted and are also 'susceptible' to all sort of psyops because of that.
One you step outside the matrix, then it really IS 'down the rabbit hole'. You enter the middle of the battle ground of psychological operations, operations being conducted by opposing forces who have had decades and decades of practice at refining their techniques, skills, not to mention having access to huge resources that we cannot compete with.
All we have is our collective hive mind, a powerful spiritual underpinning in that God wants truth to reign in the world, and whatever levels of discernment we can muster.
Think about what Donald Trump is up against. Then think about what forces WE are up against, what intel and psychological warfare forces we have put ourselves in the line of.
How to deal with a barrage of psychological battles?
-
Step back, look at the bigger picture.
-
Don't just take people (aka 'actors' - inflooencers, pundits, people we think are allies, etc) at face value but also do not dismiss your own prejudices and do not downplay your own susceptibility to manipulation.
-
Look for tell tale signs of psychological manipulation: sensationalism, highly emotive arguments, painted 'heroes' and 'evil enemies', polarization and the injection of divisive narratives, negative messages embedded in what looks like 80% 'friendly' narratives, etc.
If you measure what people are doing and what impact they are having by: does this ADVANCE the Donald Trump agenda, or does this negatively impact on it? you might get a clearer picture of what people's real objectives are, regardless of what they say to your face.
Because the FIRST thing the psychological manipulation does is to try to get you buried in tunnel vision. Get you buried in your own opinion, focused on one particular area to distract you from that larger picture, because the larger picture provides perspective and context that helps you to sift the signal from the noise.
End thought: I haven't looked closely at the TPUSA Amfest thing, but even a superficial view inspires me with hope. What exactly?
Conflicting views being expressed from the stage: eg. Ben Shapiro vs Tucker Carlson, vs Steve Bannon, vs Megyn Kelly, etc
That's healthy, and good. And apparently 'TPUSA defended allowing unscripted speeches to promote open debate'. I think that's actually a positive sign, although those that hate Trump and the MAGA movement will do their best to paint that as 'conflict, fracturing, downfall' (aka doomerism).
Regardless of what you think of all or any of the actors involved, I recommend putting all those opinions aside and asking the simple, basic question: Do you trust Donald Trump, and if so, what advances the mission of Donald Trump?
It's not about not having disagreements. It's about the common goals that we are actually fighting for. Unity does not come from an absence of disagreement. It comes from a willing engagement to work on and achieve common goals and shared objectives, goals that are based on first-principle priorities that truly serve a higher priority than just 'me'.
I'll keep this short my fren. I trust Trump so far as he advances the mission he claimed to advance. I am not ignorant of King Sauls or Solomons.
If the Great Awakening misfires into the Great One World Digital Prison, I can firmly say that either:
something went wrong, or:
it was a Great Deception all along.
Next point:
questioning Trump and/or his admin should be the equivalent of supporting him (barring obviously stupid questions such as the MSM likes to throw). If the Plan to save the world encourages critical thinking, then my stance should be the default, and Trump, in his 5d chess, would be making moves with that in mind.
Even Jesus said if you don't believe Him, believe His works.
So anyways in a 5gw psyop war you can pretty much toss the "believe me" out the window and all we really have are the works, or actions, the direction of things.
If the direction of things looks to be going into a totally different direction than what we were told at the start of the journey, it's our job to sound the alarm. And that alarm is not a threat to good-faith Trump admin—only to bad. It would be welcomed by good-faith. "Hey, course-correct now! Traps ahead."
The obvious question here is whether your original perception of 'the mission he claimed to advance' is the same as his perception of the same (aka his definition), and if that is indeed accurate.
If you misunderstood his purpose and mission, and supported him based on that misinterpretation, then you might choose to:
revise your view of what mission he has claimed to advance
revise your support for his work
Consider whether its not DJT or his admin that requires course correction, but yourself
In a general way, I agree with that. Blind belief or blind obedience are only helpful when someone or something is in a stage of infancy.
Well, I think more accurately, all we really have is [our perception] of the works, or actions, aka the direction of things
From a moral standpoint, we are responsible to make our decisions based on what we perceive, but we can never really discount the unalterable fact that ultimately, my perception might be flawed, and either way, I'm responsible for my decision and choices.
If you are critical of DJT, for example, because your perception is that he is going in a different direction to what (you thought) you were promised, then that's a moral choice, and one a moral stance requires being self-responsible for.
Although its not particularly articulated, I think I probably have a less rigid view of what I thought or think DJT should be doing. But this is also (I think) because I view him and his role within a larger framework of perception about the direction of the world, where God wants it to go, and a recognition that we, the human race, are in uncharted territory.
I'm always trying to perceive the edge of my understanding. The edge of my understanding is like a horizon that constantly changes and evolves (if you will allow the expression) as I walk closer to it, and as it unfolds, while I move forward, that horizon is always out ahead of me and is not something I can ever fully arrive at.
Note: I'm not saying that a more rigid view or less rigid view is better. I'm simply comparing and contrasting what and where our views seem to differ.
On a tangential note, I'll mention that I believe God has always known and understood the potential for the level of tech we are now approaching and which is now becoming part of our experience on all levels. But like anything in creation, the issue is not the tech, the object, the thing, but who wields it, controls it, and for what they use it.
Ultimately, I don't think this is in Trump's hands. It is, in fact, in the hands of collective humanity, and the direction it goes in is determined by who well we rise up to our God-given responsibility.
So, whether you are right or wrong, in your perception of what is happening, of what should be happening, of what you think was promised, etc, the fact that you are investing effort to make a moral decision based on your own perception, this can only be a good thing that advances the cause. Even if you are wrong. And as long as you don't do anything too stupid. (Like dye your hair blue, or sumting.) (But also if you are right, obviously.)
That's all for now.
(Lord, does what I've written even make sense? sigh.)