but practically vomiting at the idea in a huge dramatic display like u/fractal just did is....

Kekkeke. Pretty apt description.

But.... I think either you misread what I wrote, or perhaps, in my enthusiasm to vomit up a big (huge) dramatic display, I expressed the idea poorly. Although, maybe not, because Doi seemed to get it pretty clearly. Ironic that you are even replying to Doi, while missing the very point he's addressing.

In any case, perhaps I can clarify

Idea that Kirk is in witness protection, a witness protection theory - not a ridiculous idea or theory

Idea that FBI Director Kash Patel would blurt out "See you at that facility, Charlie" - a ridiculous idea or theory

For what reasons?

Patel constantly presents himself as very serious about his job. He's not trolling anymore, like he was when he jived with the (little) "q" account on Truth Social, etc.

Patel is going to openly admit to the public that the Kirk assassination is a hoax because....? Is he trying to undermine the credibility of the Administration? Of the FBI which he heads?

There is already plenty of distrust out there in - let's call it the non-MSM sphere - i.e. anons, truthers, alt-media (on the <ahem> 'right'), podsters, etc. So for what rationale reason would Patel want to further undermine public support by conducting and then openly admitting - by saying "See you Charlie at the <ahem> facility!"?

To me, the idea that Patel would do this is ridiculous, NOT the idea that in fact, the Kirk 'assassination' was a hoax, and that Kirk is in federal protection somewhere.

Although that Idea I find a little unacceptable, its not completely ridiculous. (Even though I have my own ideas about it, I won't voice them here.)

End: Doi actually makes a reasonable argument (even if I don't agree with it) about why Patel would do this. Personally, I find that line of thinking a little... gee, I mean, after a while, it seems like some of us just cram the evidence in to an ill-fitting box for the sake of preserving our perspective - aka the White Hats did it!!!!

Nonetheless, its a reasoned argument by Doi, addressing what I actually find a bit ridiculous - that Patel would openly and very prominently name the facility where - if he was actually in protection, Kirk was or is...

As for Woods, if people cannot see what he is, well, good luck to them, I say. So, trust a <corrupt> asset to do what a <corrupt> asset would do.

Hopefully, I have clarified my stance. Certainly over-clarified, in far too many words, but whatcha gonna do? Being verbose IS my super-power.

Eye-rollingly yours,

FI.

(PS. If you want to tag a user, you need to use the whole user name, like this:

[u/weholdthesetruths](/u/weholdthesetruths) as opposed to u/wehold, etc.

And if you fractured my fractal handle on purpose, well, don't I feel a fool for attempting to help a fellow frog when they don't need it... ?)

But.... thanks for responding, anyway!