There should be a 25 yr period--a moratorium--where we just say no more immigration, we're not just full. We are injured and need to HEAL. Stop it entirely.
And also, if we can't do it 'entirely' but like 99%, then letting someone in should be a peer to peer process-- if we allow for special cases. Like "citizens here vouch for them" and it should have to be like a high number. Like 100 citizens vouch for them, and they've raised the 1M dollars to let them in.
Asylum seekers are to go to.a neighboring country only. The US has two, Canada and Mexico. Shut down both none may enter for a period of time. This leaves us with no asylum seekers qualified to enter.
If we allowed 100 ppl to vouch for one, then those 100 are responsible for the one and they can be deported alone with the asylum seeker
There should be a 25 yr period--a moratorium--where we just say no more immigration, we're not just full. We are injured and need to HEAL. Stop it entirely.
And also, if we can't do it 'entirely' but like 99%, then letting someone in should be a peer to peer process-- if we allow for special cases. Like "citizens here vouch for them" and it should have to be like a high number. Like 100 citizens vouch for them, and they've raised the 1M dollars to let them in.
Teo points:
Asylum seekers are to go to.a neighboring country only. The US has two, Canada and Mexico. Shut down both none may enter for a period of time. This leaves us with no asylum seekers qualified to enter.
If we allowed 100 ppl to vouch for one, then those 100 are responsible for the one and they can be deported alone with the asylum seeker