I disagree. The most important parts were left out. For example:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.-

Why didn't Jefferson (explicitly and purposefully) say:

they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and Property.

as Locke did?

Well, this is why. From 5A:

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

That means that any and all property can be taken at any time for any reason. We assume it will only be done when it is appropriate, yet there are a million instances that it hasn't happened that way. If not for this statement, the IRS couldn't be justified. And what exactly is "just compensation"? According to whom? A person has no recourse to contest the reasoning nor the recompense by this law,

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US

by law.

It get's worse in the same amendment:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger

What does that mean? It means that the government can do whatever they want to you when you are a member of the armed forces, the militia, or any time you are associated with these domains when in a time of War or "public danger." But we've been at war for all but a couple years since 1789 (when 5A was ratified). And "public danger" is any time the whims of the leadership deem it necessary, like "National Security."

Also everyone was, at least potentially, associated with those groups through the draft (or other similar laws that existed at the same time). Now, that didn't count for the women, but at the time, women hand no rights at all, and most men (I think 70 to 80% irrc) were either indentured servants or slaves, which means they also didn't have any rights in this context. Currently, all men are still subject to this ownership (slavery) explicitly through the law, and a person can be taken at any time for any reason to do with whatever they want, by law. There are even examples of this happening (see J6, or a thousand other examples). This is from the Constitution.

It isn't just a "few poison pills." It's fundamental ownership of all property and people from the very beginning. And people don't see it, because they have been brainwashed to not see what the law really says.