Why weren't everyone arrested on day 1 of Trump's 1st administration in 2016?
Because
"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q
Q says you shouldn't be participating in discussions. Does that make Q evil?
Im willing to bet 20 bucks you're a boomer.
Wow, you're running old DARPA AI bot code. There hasn't been "boomer" division tactics used here in years.
Trump had the military at his back in 2020 and that they would not allow the steal to happen
Q # ?
Q's movement has long outgrown him
Hilarious how you speak of Q's movement in 3rd person, as though you have an understanding you're not part of the movement.
Why have you been here less than a year? Did you suddenly find Q this late in the game, or have you been banned multiple times for violating forum rules and you're on the nth instance of signing back up again?
Maybe you should leave speaking for Q's movement to those who are actually in the movement.
Zero high profile politicians were arrested in trumps first term
Again, you prance around like you're an expert on Q but have never read the side column.
"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q
Q says you shouldn't be participating in discussions, because you're too stupid to understand the above conditions. Is that true, are you really that stupid?
Why weren't everyone arrested on day 1 of Trump's 1st administration in 2016?
Because
Q says you shouldn't be participating in discussions. Does that make Q evil?
Wow, you're running old DARPA AI bot code. There hasn't been "boomer" division tactics used here in years.
Q # ?
Hilarious how you speak of Q's movement in 3rd person, as though you have an understanding you're not part of the movement.
Why have you been here less than a year? Did you suddenly find Q this late in the game, or have you been banned multiple times for violating forum rules and you're on the nth instance of signing back up again?
Maybe you should leave speaking for Q's movement to those who are actually in the movement.
Again, you prance around like you're an expert on Q but have never read the side column.
Q says you shouldn't be participating in discussions, because you're too stupid to understand the above conditions. Is that true, are you really that stupid?