Stop using lazy strawman fallacy arguments like this one.
And stop playing gatekeeper on your own threads where you begged for participation from the GAW community, yet try to stomp out the entirely reasonable responses you don't like.
artificial agents created under this program will learn best practices for online mediation by observing human experts and then employ these skills to interactively guide user groups to adhere to community guidelines
I defy you to read the above page and describe how DARPA could accomplish what it states its doing without using AI chat bots to infiltrate social media and forums.
To accomplish this, SMISC will focus research on linguistic cues, patterns of information flow and detection of sentiment or opinion in information generated and spread through social media. Researchers will also attempt to track ideas and concepts to analyze patterns and cultural narratives. If successful, they should be able to model emergent communities and analyze narratives and their participants, as well as characterize generation of automated content, such as by bots, in social media and crowd sourcing.
SMISC was launched in 2011, over 15 years ago. Ya think they might have gotten any better at it since then?
Do you have any extraordinary proof for this?
Let's see. Now that you've been proven wrong, what do you do?
I referred to claims about specific people being "bots"
Goalpost shift. Goalpost shift again. And again.
Did I name any specific people? No.
I said AI bots are common.
Your zeal in defending the rights of people you specifically wrote a thread to admonish is remarkable.
How is it you care so much about scolding the blackpill crowd who are crying nothing is happening, so much so that you authored an entire thread about it, but are offended at maximum level that anyone would suggest a blackpiller is a bot.
Incredibly weird.
Right here, right now, you could go to chatgpt and ask it to instruct you in making an AI bot. You can have the bot represent a viewpoint. You can give it a set of exact instructions in documents of hundreds of megs in size. You can set it lose and watch it respond to people with the point of view you gave it. It's nearly trivial for civilians to do this for free, and the cabal has trillions at their disposal.
Stop using lazy strawman fallacy arguments like this one.
And stop playing gatekeeper on your own threads where you begged for participation from the GAW community, yet try to stomp out the entirely reasonable responses you don't like.
The "bot" claim is unbelievably common. Most people using the "bot" card cannot give any evidence or reason why, and are typically wrong.
Do you have any extraordinary proof for this?
https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/civil-sanctuary
I defy you to read the above page and describe how DARPA could accomplish what it states its doing without using AI chat bots to infiltrate social media and forums.
https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/social-media-in-strategic-communication
SMISC was launched in 2011, over 15 years ago. Ya think they might have gotten any better at it since then?
Let's see. Now that you've been proven wrong, what do you do?
I referred to claims about specific people being "bots". I wasn't saying anything about Darpa's capabilities nor claiming that bots don't exist.
Goalpost shift. Goalpost shift again. And again.
Did I name any specific people? No.
I said AI bots are common.
Your zeal in defending the rights of people you specifically wrote a thread to admonish is remarkable.
How is it you care so much about scolding the blackpill crowd who are crying nothing is happening, so much so that you authored an entire thread about it, but are offended at maximum level that anyone would suggest a blackpiller is a bot.
Incredibly weird.
Right here, right now, you could go to chatgpt and ask it to instruct you in making an AI bot. You can have the bot represent a viewpoint. You can give it a set of exact instructions in documents of hundreds of megs in size. You can set it lose and watch it respond to people with the point of view you gave it. It's nearly trivial for civilians to do this for free, and the cabal has trillions at their disposal.