So, I have been watching a certain kind of news article for many, many years. The news article has a very formulaic template of
“LARGE NUMBER OF PEDOS ARRESTED, LARGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN RESCUED”
idk why these stories caught my attention. maybe it was their compulsive need to “hedge” facts
for example, they might say AT LEAST 152 pedos arrested, and AT LEAST 63 children rescued
what you mean “at least”?
if there was MORE than 152 or 63, then maybe just give us that exact number, instead of implying theres some sort of ambigiuty on basic facts
I was also “concerned” that the authorities seem to sit on these cases for many years, before taking any action, which means to me that “at least” 63 children were being abused daily while the authorites are sipping coffee…
I spent many hours chasing these stories, trying to find any actual evidence that anyone was arrested, or that anyone was rescued
At first, i could NEVER find any supporting evidence, such as the suspects names, mugshots, court dates, convictions, etc
After many posts and comments like the one you are reading now, things started to change….
Now we get a whole page of names and mugshots, but the faces feel like AI, and so do the names.
When you try to follow-up on these names, theres almost nothing out there. No local news etc
So, just recently i had the bright idea to use ChatGPT to make a master list of all these supposed operations, and how they were resolved
ChatGPT would cite a government claim, like a DOJ press release, as actual evidence
When i pressed harder, ChatGPT conceeded there was no real evidence outside of vague claims made by the government
ChatGPT also mentioned how a lot of times, these long running “fed” operations were actually just a summary of what local law enforcement had been doing over the last X years
Local cops bust a local pimp, the feds take credit, and lump the local bust in with
“operation look busy because the boss is coming”
i also asked chatGPT to produce any evidence that any of these supposedly rescue children actually exist.
ChatGPT gave me all kinds of reasons why they couldn’t give me any evidence and none of them were very convincing at all
Out of the thousands of children supposedly rescued, none of them have made a social media page or started a foundation or organization or whatever to publicize what happened to them and to publicize the problems and maybe try to do something about it
Mark my word: because I will be referencing this post in the near future…
After this post goes out, a person will emerge and claim that they were a victim of child sex trafficking, and that they were rescued during one of these operations. However, if we dig deeper on this person, we will find out they are nothing more than a crisis actor, feeding us another scripted line of bullshit.
My challenge to anyone reading this:
Make a mental note to yourself, that next time you hear a big story about a bunch of pedophiles being arrested in children being rescued, you’re gonna check it out a little deeper
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your hometown
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your home state
You’re gonna find out if any of these people have mug shots or their names
You’re gonna find out if there’s any court dates
And you’re gonna find out if there’s any convictions
And I think what you will find very quickly, is that these stories are very long on big claims, and very short on hard evidence
One feature of these fake news stories, is that they have multiple perps, multiple victims,
And so you, as part of the audience, listening to this story, and trying to imagine what happened from their vague description
You are unable to empathize with more than one person at a time.
This is a weird quirk of human nature that was discovered by charities who were advertising for help feeding starving Africans. They noticed that if they put the face of an individual child on ad, it got a lot more response than if they showed an entire village of starving people.
Upon further observation, they eventually noticed that even having two children in an ad would reduce the effectiveness of the ad and the giving. It was only when they showed one individual child that the audience was able to empathize with that child and was willing to help.
In all other cases, the audience goes into a state of shock, of paralysis, like a deer in headlights, they don’t know what to do, they feel overwhelmed, they freeze up, they glitch out,
And its the same effect here
They say there are 63 victims rescued, and you simply “can’t imagine” each of their stories at the exact same time, so you glitch.
This is how they “stun” the audience of sheep into submission to their narratives
Ok. But in this case who is they and what is their goal in doing this?
Its weird to me.
on the one hand, they are constantly re-introducing us to the concept of a pedophile ring. i probably never would have heard of a pedo ring if not for these fake news stories
on the other hand, they are constantly reassuring us that they are busy protecting us from the constant threat of pedo rings
boogeyman ops?
protection racket?
I never heard about pedo rings in the news. I heard about them on the chans after learning about Q. Madeline Mccann and the Podestas and all that. I see no reason to think that stuff isn’t real, but at the very least these rings likely don’t involve many American children, and at the very least not white ones, cause we Whites talk about that shit. If my kid went missing I’d make sure the whole world knew. If he/she turned back up I’d make sure they knew too. So I appreciate you pointing that out, but I’m not sure where that info is gonna take me just yet.