Those articles show data centers building on-site generation because the grid is congested and slow, not because Trump issued a requirement.
They’re solving a capacity bottleneck, not following a mandate.
Totally different question than the headline here, which is policy claim vs. market behavior.
We're going back and forth because the OP is living in one possible future outcome and I'm living in the present.
Because President Trump has said what should happen and said that he was going to speak to the companies and the OP just jumped into their time machine and traveled straight to the point in time where AI centers were made to foot the entire bill for the energy required for the new data centers and consumers no longer had to pay for the spikes in their electric bills.
And people are apparently upset because they think me questioning what the OP is claiming = me calling President Trump a liar. 🤷♀️
And somehow me living in the present is somehow a threat to whatever will happen in the future. Like I jeopardize the space-time continuim because I ask for evidence of these mandates being used now. 🙄
Dude, or ma'am, I understand what you are saying and I would like facts and written policy too, and it seems we don't have that right now. However, this has started a discussion, and that is the first step in making policy. I do applaud you for asking questions.
Thanks. I was getting the feeling I was in Bizarro World because of the hostility I was getting because I asked some basic questions instead of just believing something because some random person made a claim...
Just...this deal with people believing pretty much anything they see posted here, without doing any work to verify it at all boggles my mind.
Especially when this is supposed to be an elite research board.
And Q literally told us to question everything.
But that seems to have morphed into:
"Question nothing you see here.
and
"Even the most basic of research is too much bother. Just post any old thing here. Doesn't matter if it's true or not."
I would like facts and written policy too, and it seems we don't have that right now.
:facepalm: it’s always fun when you say something and it’s not accepted, then someone else says the same thing and the response comes back “yeah, of course!”
Y'all are going back and forth calling heads and tails. It's the same coin. But here ya go...
https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-oil/ai-data-centers-desperate-for-electricity-are-building-their-own-power-plants-291f5c81
https://grist.org/energy/data-centers-are-building-their-own-gas-power-plants-in-texas/
https://www.leylinecapital.com/news/ai-data-centers-desperate-for-electricity-are-building-their-own-power-plants
https://blog.ucs.org/mike-jacobs/power-hungry-why-data-centers-are-developing-their-own-energy-sources-to-fuel-ai/
I think you know how to use a search engine.
Those articles show data centers building on-site generation because the grid is congested and slow, not because Trump issued a requirement.
They’re solving a capacity bottleneck, not following a mandate.
Totally different question than the headline here, which is policy claim vs. market behavior.
We're going back and forth because the OP is living in one possible future outcome and I'm living in the present.
Because President Trump has said what should happen and said that he was going to speak to the companies and the OP just jumped into their time machine and traveled straight to the point in time where AI centers were made to foot the entire bill for the energy required for the new data centers and consumers no longer had to pay for the spikes in their electric bills.
And people are apparently upset because they think me questioning what the OP is claiming = me calling President Trump a liar. 🤷♀️
And somehow me living in the present is somehow a threat to whatever will happen in the future. Like I jeopardize the space-time continuim because I ask for evidence of these mandates being used now. 🙄
Dude, or ma'am, I understand what you are saying and I would like facts and written policy too, and it seems we don't have that right now. However, this has started a discussion, and that is the first step in making policy. I do applaud you for asking questions.
Thanks. I was getting the feeling I was in Bizarro World because of the hostility I was getting because I asked some basic questions instead of just believing something because some random person made a claim...
Just...this deal with people believing pretty much anything they see posted here, without doing any work to verify it at all boggles my mind.
Especially when this is supposed to be an elite research board.
And Q literally told us to question everything.
But that seems to have morphed into:
"Question nothing you see here.
and
"Even the most basic of research is too much bother. Just post any old thing here. Doesn't matter if it's true or not."
:facepalm: it’s always fun when you say something and it’s not accepted, then someone else says the same thing and the response comes back “yeah, of course!”
Kek.
Words. Amiright?