Just pointing that out MD was addressing the “should” in your question.

Here are several news articles (primarily from 2025, as the major discussion peaked then) that directly address the question "Should DOGE audit Fort Knox?" — or explore the debate, arguments for/against, and related proposals. These pieces highlight calls for transparency, the lack of recent independent audits (last full one in the 1950s, partial in 1974), potential benefits like restoring public trust, and counterpoints from Treasury officials claiming annual internal checks suffice and that the gold is fully accounted for.

The debate largely favors an audit for accountability and to dispel long-standing conspiracy theories, though some note logistical challenges (e.g., it could take 18+ months) and official assurances that no full external audit is necessary.

1. Fox Business (Feb 17, 2025): "Elon Musk's DOGE prepares to audit US gold reserves at Fort Knox after urging by Sen. Rand Paul"
   Sen. Rand Paul strongly argues yes — no yearly review exists, more transparency ("sunlight") is needed to confirm the reserves back the dollar's trust, and he's pushed for this for a decade.
   URL: https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/elon-musks-doge-prepares-audit-us-gold-reserves-ft-knox-after-urging-sen-rand-paul

2. Brave New Coin (Feb 17, 2025): "Elon Musk, DOGE, and the Fort Knox Gold Audit: An Overdue Reckoning?"
   Argues yes, it's long overdue for legitimacy and to counter resistance from institutions; demand for transparency is "legitimate and necessary" amid no comprehensive external audit since the 1950s.
   URL: https://bravenewcoin.com/insights/elon-musk-doge-and-the-fort-knox-gold-audit-an-overdue-reckoning

3. Nasdaq (2025): "Musk Proposes DOGE Audit of Fort Knox Gold Reserves"
   Financial analysts say yes — lack of transparency could erode confidence in U.S. reserves, especially as global central banks boost gold holdings; Musk/DOGE involvement could push accountability.
   URL: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/musk-proposes-doge-audit-fort-knox-gold-reserves

4. JMBullion (2025): "Can Fort Knox Be Audited? Here’s How Long It Could Potentially Take"
   Discusses DOGE's initial pledge (which didn't fully happen) and notes Rep. Thomas Massie's bill for independent audits every 5 years; implies yes for verification, but highlights massive logistical hurdles (18+ months, specialized teams).
   URL: https://www.jmbullion.com/investing-guide/facts/fort-knox-audit

5. Noble Gold Investments (Apr 4, 2025): "Economic Impacts of the Fort Knox Audit"
   Proponents argue yes to boost government transparency and reduce skepticism/conspiracy theories; no recent independent audits fuel doubts despite Treasury claims.
   URL: https://noblegoldinvestments.com/learn/blog/fort-knox-audit-economic-impact

6. Newsweek (Feb 17, 2025): "Is Elon Musk Auditing Fort Knox’s Gold Reserve? What We Know"
   Explores encouragement from lawmakers/social media for DOGE to do it; experts say it could restore citizen confidence, though officials insist reviews occur and there's "no reason to doubt" the gold is there.
   URL: https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-auditing-fort-knox-2032128

As of mid-January 2026, the idea still circulates in online discussions (e.g., US Debt Clock posts asking "Should DOGE Audit Fort Knox Gold Reserves?"), but no full DOGE-led audit materialized in 2025 despite initial buzz and Trump/Musk interest. Treasury maintains annual audits confirm everything is intact. If you'd like summaries of specific arguments or more recent X chatter, let me know!