Same thing. "Satanists" don't believe in anything, they are literally just atheists who want to be "edgy" and popular by being heretical. They both just hate Christianity. It can be proven by simply trying to find atheists or "satanists" criticizing any other religion and seeing the extreme disparity. Satan is in both Islam and Judaism, yet you'll only ever find criticism of Christianity.
All we need to understand is that our enemies hate it. They don't hate Islam or Judaism or any other religion. Without God, people will naturally find something to fill the void, such as a mysteriously anonymous political profit that fits Michael Aquino's definition of "cyber shaman". Women will fill it with daddy-government while non-gay men continue to look for something deeper but usually end up in various "online communities" (mini cults), or diving deep into vidya game addiction as an escape from reality that they view as near-meaningless.
I came here to promote Christ, and you felt the need to defend atheists who hate Christ by deflecting the criticism towards "satanists" who hate Christ the same. What do you understand far better than I?
I think it's quite simple: you know who your enemies are and you know what they hate the most. You don't have to be religious to understand that you know who your enemies are and you know what they hate the most. You don't have to believe in old books to understand that you know who your enemies are and you know what they hate the most. You know who your enemies are and you know what they hate the most; so why are you defending them? Why are you calling me ignorant for promoting what they hate the most?
You could have said: hollistic view as this takes into account not only the rational, which often is dialectic, a juxtaposition with elimination, which leads to the materialistic atheistic views [plural], but also takes into account the physical and spiritual view.
It shows you move from incredulity.
Going by the picture: the lower one is the religious view, the invisible effecting the visible. the upper one then, becomes the humanist / atheist view. ....man effecting the visible world.
Quite the twist, isn't it?
Of course this is all mechanistic Newtonian and quite simplistic. Hardly has anything to do with Q.
There is freedom vs slavery, life vs death, humanity vs satanism
You see a man holding a hammer, but you don't see a carpenter.
You see the tool without the man and view it as religious because that is your religion: you have faith in only the material word and the tools that created it because that's all you perceive.
You are offended by the juxtaposition of "Rational" beside "Atheist" implying the atheist view is irrational, this was intentional.
The rational view is that the house was built by a builder, rather than the nails being hammered in by floating magic tools. When you see something that's been built, it is rational to conclude someone had done it. When you know something was once chaos and you see that it has been put in order, it is irrational to believe it was done by floating magic.
What do you call someone who believes in something without evidence? Faithful. Atheists tend to be the most faithful folks there are. Their rigid disbelief of God and their faith in God's absence is ironically its own theism. Most kids grow out of it once they see they lack the evidence to disprove the world's various religions and move from a position of foolish certainty to agnosticism. The athiests who dont grow out of it and remain stubbornly faithful antibelievers are rightfully subject to ridicule and memes and jokes at their expense.
Interesting to read the comments and hear the debate between Satanist and atheist. But Does it really matter? Both are without God (Both have this in common) " IT IS APPOINTED TO EVERY MAN ONCE TO DIE"(Hebrews 9:27) (And then the judgment) That which is disputed now will not be then. Christ is King! "Every eye shall see him" "every knee shall bow" "every tongue shall confess that Christ is Lord" to the Glory of God" (Philippians 2:10) Therefore what really matters is (the right time is now) "Today is the day of salvation"
You're demonstrating your ignorance; particularly on a Q forum
Q pointed out who the enemy is. Satanists.
https://qalerts.app/?q=satan
Q never mentioned atheists a single time.
There is no such thing as darkness, only lack of light
There is no such thing as coldness, only lack of heat
What's the difference between those who deny God and those who reject Him?
I'm sorry that the meme offended you.
Same thing. "Satanists" don't believe in anything, they are literally just atheists who want to be "edgy" and popular by being heretical. They both just hate Christianity. It can be proven by simply trying to find atheists or "satanists" criticizing any other religion and seeing the extreme disparity. Satan is in both Islam and Judaism, yet you'll only ever find criticism of Christianity.
It's a meme lol
My daughter is a Christian.
My aunt and uncle are Christians.
All are good people that behave very respectfully.
I don’t hate them at all.
I am not the “boogeyman” you’re looking for.
I don’t “hate” Christianity at all. I just believe that I understand it far better than you.
All we need to understand is that our enemies hate it. They don't hate Islam or Judaism or any other religion. Without God, people will naturally find something to fill the void, such as a mysteriously anonymous political profit that fits Michael Aquino's definition of "cyber shaman". Women will fill it with daddy-government while non-gay men continue to look for something deeper but usually end up in various "online communities" (mini cults), or diving deep into vidya game addiction as an escape from reality that they view as near-meaningless.
I came here to promote Christ, and you felt the need to defend atheists who hate Christ by deflecting the criticism towards "satanists" who hate Christ the same. What do you understand far better than I?
I think it's quite simple: you know who your enemies are and you know what they hate the most. You don't have to be religious to understand that you know who your enemies are and you know what they hate the most. You don't have to believe in old books to understand that you know who your enemies are and you know what they hate the most. You know who your enemies are and you know what they hate the most; so why are you defending them? Why are you calling me ignorant for promoting what they hate the most?
You clearly must know something that I do not.
Your picture headings are wrong.
You could have said: hollistic view as this takes into account not only the rational, which often is dialectic, a juxtaposition with elimination, which leads to the materialistic atheistic views [plural], but also takes into account the physical and spiritual view.
It shows you move from incredulity.
Going by the picture: the lower one is the religious view, the invisible effecting the visible. the upper one then, becomes the humanist / atheist view. ....man effecting the visible world.
Quite the twist, isn't it?
Of course this is all mechanistic Newtonian and quite simplistic. Hardly has anything to do with Q.
There is freedom vs slavery, life vs death, humanity vs satanism
You see a man holding a hammer, but you don't see a carpenter.
You see the tool without the man and view it as religious because that is your religion: you have faith in only the material word and the tools that created it because that's all you perceive.
You are offended by the juxtaposition of "Rational" beside "Atheist" implying the atheist view is irrational, this was intentional.
The rational view is that the house was built by a builder, rather than the nails being hammered in by floating magic tools. When you see something that's been built, it is rational to conclude someone had done it. When you know something was once chaos and you see that it has been put in order, it is irrational to believe it was done by floating magic.
What do you call someone who believes in something without evidence? Faithful. Atheists tend to be the most faithful folks there are. Their rigid disbelief of God and their faith in God's absence is ironically its own theism. Most kids grow out of it once they see they lack the evidence to disprove the world's various religions and move from a position of foolish certainty to agnosticism. The athiests who dont grow out of it and remain stubbornly faithful antibelievers are rightfully subject to ridicule and memes and jokes at their expense.
Interesting to read the comments and hear the debate between Satanist and atheist. But Does it really matter? Both are without God (Both have this in common) " IT IS APPOINTED TO EVERY MAN ONCE TO DIE"(Hebrews 9:27) (And then the judgment) That which is disputed now will not be then. Christ is King! "Every eye shall see him" "every knee shall bow" "every tongue shall confess that Christ is Lord" to the Glory of God" (Philippians 2:10) Therefore what really matters is (the right time is now) "Today is the day of salvation"