So what's your explanation for all this?
JKR is a super liberal hardcore globalist ultra-feminist misandrist commie. She took to twitter to spout all the far left propaganda for years and years before the fake right wing made her into an idol for speaking out against one single issue. She's not on our side, guys. She is incredibly pro-gay despite being anti-trans.
And gays rape children at a such a high rate that it dwarfs violent black crime statistics so much that conpro racists should redefine the "per capita" meme. More than half of all child abuse cases are from gay men, a demographic that is less than one percent of the population.
Try even suggesting it without being removed for antisemetic hate speech. This is a huge rabbit hole to go down. All animal rights organizations in America (like PETA and HSUS) are run by Jews who intentionally kick out anyone who targets Kosher.
Fun Fact: The Nazis pioneered animal rights and were the first in history to outlaw animal cruelty and enforce regulations on their treatment. Hitler was a vegetarian who despised the barbaric practice known as "kosher slaughter", where the cow is hung upside-down from their legs while alive, and then cut vertically down the trachea (the wind-pipe) without severing the two large arteries it is between. This difficult task causes the cow to drown in its blood and can over 20 minutes for them to die, whereas a simple cut of those arteries wold kill it in seconds. Kosher law prohibits the use of painkillers and prohibits the cow from being stunned or knocked out or put to sleep beforehand. It is by far the most cruel thing you can do to an animal. And it is legal today.
Fun Fact: The Nazis pioneered animal rights and were the first in history to outlaw animal cruelty and enforce regulations on their treatment. Hitler was a vegetarian who despised the barbaric practice known as "kosher slaughter", where the cow is hung upside-down from their legs while alive, and then cut vertically down the trachea (the wind-pipe) without severing the two large arteries it is between. This difficult task causes the cow to drown in its blood and can over 20 minutes for them to die, whereas a simple cut of those arteries wold kill it in seconds. Kosher law prohibits the use of painkillers and prohibits the cow from being stunned or knocked out or put to sleep beforehand. It is by far the most cruel thing you can do to an animal. And it is legal today.
That must be really fresh and tender pork to pass as veal!
Also doubt it was done entirely from an anti-muslim sentiment. Could be a simple scam to charge more for a cheaper product.
Yeah why would trump tout one of his failures? She DID get away with it!
$5,000 x 350,000,000 people = $1,750,000,000,000 ($1.75B)
DOGE found TRILLIONS in wasted funding, almost all of it was annual, consistent payments taken from our tax pool! For example, $7,000 / month to qualifying illegals and bullshit jobs that have existed for years.
We are not now saving those trillions of dollars every year, we are getting a one time check for $5,000 and that's it? Is my income tax still gonna go down? They found trillions in wasted spending and think a one-time payment is enough? And insult us with a payment less than 2 billion ( 1 trillion is 1,000 billion ).
I felt silenced and, as an American, that made me angry. I'm sorry for the negativity, I meant I was being critical of Trump, and I never meant to misrepresent by paraphrasing, rather to show my misunderstanding through my paraphrasing.
This is the quote, in full, that I grabbed from the side of this page:
"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q
I am one of those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting. Therefore, according to this quote, I am one of those who should not be participating in discussions.
I'm certain many people agree. But I'm confused because you said there's no "don't arrest anyone" logic, yet that contradicts with my understanding of "we cannot simply start arresting".
Maybe I bring negativity through my skepticism because I view this logic as a stall tactic. It's a lethargic, do-nothing attitude because the existence of Q implies a deep counter-conspiracy working in our favor.
So let me ask, do you think that I should not be participating in discussions due to my (mis)understanding of this? And, if so, do you think that aligns with American values?
I had an account get banned here for asking what is the plan for the January 6th political prisoners who have been detained without trial for nearly 4 years. Seems everyone forgot or doesn't care anymore.
Sorry that I was being so critical of your idol, I just wanted to know if anyone heard anything about pardons. But the response of getting banned showed me that GA is not a free speech community.
I never understood what "Q" is, but liked this page and got involved back during the scamdemic because this was a good place to get factual fuel for my sanity. But since that happened years ago, I don't really think of GA as a community of openly shared knowledge, but rather a curated forum.
"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting ... should not be participating in discussions." Q
Guess Q says I should shut up then. Drain the swamp really means "removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success", so we clearly cannot arrest corrupt officials, they must resign on their own to "ensure success".
We can't arrest any corrupt politicians because we need to defeat ISIS and MS13 first to prevent fail-safes.
Isn't that backwards? Don't we need to remove the corruption in order to stop the terrorist gangs? How are we gonna fight MS13 while our own politicians are importing them? Give me any solution at all that isn't arresting the anti-American politicians.
I try to hold my tongue here because the rules clearly say that I should not be participating in discussion. But how is any community supposed to grow like that? How is anyone supposed to understand this "don't arrest anyone" logic without being able to engage in the conversation?
Interesting calligraphy
We should all be supporting this. Imagine if both the winners and the losers demanded an audit. First it'd confuse them, (why would WE want an audit?) but they'd go along with it. Then the results would show corruption among the democrats. Then they would try to rig the audit, creating fake stories of corruption as well as cover-ups for real corruption. In the end, election fraud would become an undeniable fact all that americans believe in. What could result of 350 million americans discovering that the past 4 years of governmental leadership was illegitimate?
That's a relief. I was hoping someone would comment saying "yes I've seen it".
Must have had a pager.
Louis Pasteur invented pasteurization, and he named the process after himself. He is also the founder of "Germ" Theory, named after his hated for Germans.
I knew someone who went to europe. He tried some cheese despite being insanely intolerant of dairy, because it was an occasion. he felt fine so he tried more the next day, and within a few days, he was eating ice cream and drinking lattes. He came back to the states and returned to being intolerant. The conclusion being that the milk here is different from the milk there.
The photoshop still doesnt distract from the piece of cheese on a cold, raw burger
Well if they were the same questions youve seen before, than it wouldnt be a proper iq test. When you took the SAT, did you take practice tests beforehand? Were they anything like the actual SAT? Probably not. The point of these kinds of tests is that you are unable to practice for them because they are not trying to find your ability to study, they are testings your ability to understand and implement new patterns of data as they are presented to you.
Also, don't be upset if you test low. I agree with almost all arguments against IQ tests, such as how there are different kinds of intelligence and different kinds of tests that are weighted to different kinds of intelligence or how some tests are bias towards certain mindsets and worldviews. It's almost a useless stat, but its broad enough for most large corporation to use them in determining who they hire (which is what sparked this entire conversation).
Think of it like this, there is talent and there is skill. A talent is something that someone seems to be born with, they are good at something despite not having done it before. A skill is something at requires years of practice. But if you are talented to begin with, that helps a ton and it may take less practice to reach the level of a more skilled person.
Intelligence is like talent but knowledge is like skill. I'm sorry for being offensive earlier.
Having a set standards for people is not heretical. It is necessary for certain careers. That is why the military, all universities and almost every corporation uses some form of IQ test. This indeed limits which people follow those paths but it is for their own benefit to be guided where they would not struggle.
Intelligence is the speed it takes you to understand something. Your intelligence does not increase over the years, rather it gets worse as we age and our brains degenerate. Your IQ was likely HIGHER when you were 13 years old. Intelligence isn't the sum of knowledge that you have acquired over the years, it is your ability to absorb, understand and implement new knowledge. Our neurons die over time and we lose that ability (our speed) as we get older.
That's because you are retarded. No offense, but that's basic algebra and exponentiation which most people learn in middle school. It took you 20 years to grasp it. That doesn't mean that you're any worse of a software engineer than the rest, but the speed at which it took you to understand certain complex concepts could have been predicted by you taking that IQ test when you were 13.
Your main implication is that you would score higher on an IQ test now than if you were to take one 20 years ago; that's not true and if you truly think that than you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what an IQ test is.
The most important skill is the ability to adapt.
Yes, that is intelligence. The ability to adapt is intelligence.
Known information is called knowledge
Your ability to do something is called talent
Your ability to do something well from experience is called skill
If you have both knowledge and skill than you're an expert
But the ability to think, calculate and adapt is called intelligence.
Intelligence is your mental speed, your wit, your capability to understand something new as it is presented to you.
In my view intelligence cannot be measured.
It can be but many argue about the methodology or the different categories of intelligence. But your speed is literally your intelligence. That's why we call unintelligent people "slow" or "retarded" (medical term for "slow").
Ok.. they why don't every large corporation just give people an IQ test.
They all do.