Solomon Brothers banking. hmmmm... Makes me wonder if the World Trade center was just the backdrop for something bigger. Like having the Solomon Brother's building collapse in order to hide something they didn't want discovered, like empty bank vaults. I bet they were suppose to have millions of ounces of gold and silver in those vaults and they were actually empty. Imagine the insurance company that had to pay out on a bank building housing that kind of gold and silver reserves. But shouldn't the gold and silver been in the ground at least? I doubt it could have just vanished because a building fell on it. Oh well, everything is now suspect concerning the WTC fiasco. It wasn't about ragheads wanting to do harm to America, it was the Deep State tightening its grip on America. And we allowed it to happen. See what occurs when you open your eyes and begin learning about the evils of the world? You regain control of your lives.
I saw that in real time. Wasn't the BBC though (CBS?); my guess is that several channels made the same faux-pax -- someone sent "Building 7 went down" to all the media drones ahead of time (maybe the plan was to have it go down sooner). I wonder who that was, and what happened later to him or her.
I know it was a controlled demolition, but in the interest of 100% scrutiny in our truth seeking, I will say this:
It is possible that rather than using a reporter in New York, the BBC just put a London reporter in front of a green screen and played live footage behind her that wasn't completely live.
In other words, dishonesty (as usual) but not necessarily evidence of preknowledge.
Does it really matter?
Yes, because we know the cabal propagates red herring evidence so that the spot light will slowly move away from real evidence until, eventually, it is barely even mentioned by anyone.
In this case, it could be meant to pull the spotlight away from the Odigo preknowledge evidence and the put-option preknowledge evidence.
Both of which are strong evidence but have no amusing clip to accompany them.
Yep...BBC announced things before they happened...
Timing is everything…
Solomon Brothers banking. hmmmm... Makes me wonder if the World Trade center was just the backdrop for something bigger. Like having the Solomon Brother's building collapse in order to hide something they didn't want discovered, like empty bank vaults. I bet they were suppose to have millions of ounces of gold and silver in those vaults and they were actually empty. Imagine the insurance company that had to pay out on a bank building housing that kind of gold and silver reserves. But shouldn't the gold and silver been in the ground at least? I doubt it could have just vanished because a building fell on it. Oh well, everything is now suspect concerning the WTC fiasco. It wasn't about ragheads wanting to do harm to America, it was the Deep State tightening its grip on America. And we allowed it to happen. See what occurs when you open your eyes and begin learning about the evils of the world? You regain control of your lives.
ENRON Files and "Project Hammer" were tied to Building 7
https://decryptedmatrix.com/bushs-project-hammer/
I saw that in real time. Wasn't the BBC though (CBS?); my guess is that several channels made the same faux-pax -- someone sent "Building 7 went down" to all the media drones ahead of time (maybe the plan was to have it go down sooner). I wonder who that was, and what happened later to him or her.
There was someone caught saying ‘pull it’ if I remember correctly.
I remember that also.
It was Lucky Larry.
"Welcome to the party, pal!"
I know it was a controlled demolition, but in the interest of 100% scrutiny in our truth seeking, I will say this:
It is possible that rather than using a reporter in New York, the BBC just put a London reporter in front of a green screen and played live footage behind her that wasn't completely live.
In other words, dishonesty (as usual) but not necessarily evidence of preknowledge.
Does it really matter?
Yes, because we know the cabal propagates red herring evidence so that the spot light will slowly move away from real evidence until, eventually, it is barely even mentioned by anyone.
In this case, it could be meant to pull the spotlight away from the Odigo preknowledge evidence and the put-option preknowledge evidence.
Both of which are strong evidence but have no amusing clip to accompany them.