Instead of using the the stamp to get the number of the Q post, I searched how many Q posts were made at 23:01. There are 7. They are from 23:01:00 to 23:01:59 order Q posts 3110, 252: 506, 4474, 1569, 4147, & 4961. Do any of these relate to Scavino’s post?
I have commented on other posts that using a time stamp to identify a Q post eliminates all posts ending between 60 and 99.
Also, on the archive qagg.news, there’s a drop box labeled Digging Options in the upper left of the screen that allows the user to dig by clock options.
Instead of using the the stamp to get the number of the Q post, I searched how many Q posts were made at 23:01. There are 7. They are from 23:01:00 to 23:01:59 order Q posts 3110, 252: 506, 4474, 1569, 4147, & 4961. Do any of these relate to Scavino’s post?
I have commented on other posts that using a time stamp to identify a Q post eliminates all posts ending between 60 and 99.
Also, on the archive qagg.news, there’s a drop box labeled Digging Options in the upper left of the screen that allows the user to dig by clock options.
Just to check:
u/#q252
u/#q506
u/#q4474
u/#q1569
u/#q3110
u/#q4147
u/#q4961