I don't know why you're being downvoted for this comment.
Because asking for actual, real facts that would allow these types of things to happen is popping people's Hopium balloons.
For the most part, people are operating on vague wishes and gross misunderstanding of how our laws and government works.
Q said that we had to do things legally. And we have laws and the US Constitution to abide by.
But people just want the military to run in and take over and make all their wishes come true. Even though that is NOT allowed by our laws or the US Constitution.
And I'm sick of people using the US Constitution to support the 2nd Amendment, saying that making it more difficult to get guns is violating their 2nd Amendment ("Shall Not Be Infringed!") and then just ignoring the rest of it when it doesn't suit them. You can't say that the US Constitution is sacred and can't be violated out of one side of your mouth and then actively call for violating it out of the other side. (Using the general "you" in this case, not you, specifically. I'm sure you get that, but I just want to be clear. )
But people get really butt hurt when I ask them for actual, real laws that would support whatever they're talking about to happen. Because they can't find any. (Not that they actually looked to begin with. Even attempting to look for facts is too much for most people on this elite research board. 🙄)
They act like laws aren't written down for everyone to see and they're all shrouded in mystery or something. They just believe whatever they read, from random ass people on X, who are just interested in getting clicks and have no idea what they're talking about.
Don't get me wrong, I would absolutely love it if we could legally throw all the wolves to the military and have them take care of all of it. That would be absolutely wonderful. But things aren't true just because I want them to be.
And I fully acknowledge I'm not a Constitutional lawyer or scholar or expert, so there could very well be real laws out there that could allow this to happen. But I haven't come across them yet and asking for others to share if they know of any seems to be a logical thing to do.
But most people don't give a bee's burp for laws and just go on vibes and wishes and misunderstanding of laws. It basically boils down to everything being "But if you take X and Y and add blue and subtract Oreos, then it could happen!!!"
They just cobble together a bunch of random, unrelated concepts, throw in a lot of misunderstanding of laws, mix it up while clicking their heels three times and throwing salt over their shoulder and call that proof. 🤷♀️
Even attempting to look for facts is too much for most people on this elite research board.
Without regard to what the rest of your argument is - this particular line is something that everyone, self included, should always be working on, rather than emoting agreement or disagreement.
Thank you!
Because asking for actual, real facts that would allow these types of things to happen is popping people's Hopium balloons.
For the most part, people are operating on vague wishes and gross misunderstanding of how our laws and government works.
Q said that we had to do things legally. And we have laws and the US Constitution to abide by.
But people just want the military to run in and take over and make all their wishes come true. Even though that is NOT allowed by our laws or the US Constitution.
And I'm sick of people using the US Constitution to support the 2nd Amendment, saying that making it more difficult to get guns is violating their 2nd Amendment ("Shall Not Be Infringed!") and then just ignoring the rest of it when it doesn't suit them. You can't say that the US Constitution is sacred and can't be violated out of one side of your mouth and then actively call for violating it out of the other side. (Using the general "you" in this case, not you, specifically. I'm sure you get that, but I just want to be clear. )
But people get really butt hurt when I ask them for actual, real laws that would support whatever they're talking about to happen. Because they can't find any. (Not that they actually looked to begin with. Even attempting to look for facts is too much for most people on this elite research board. 🙄)
They act like laws aren't written down for everyone to see and they're all shrouded in mystery or something. They just believe whatever they read, from random ass people on X, who are just interested in getting clicks and have no idea what they're talking about.
Don't get me wrong, I would absolutely love it if we could legally throw all the wolves to the military and have them take care of all of it. That would be absolutely wonderful. But things aren't true just because I want them to be.
And I fully acknowledge I'm not a Constitutional lawyer or scholar or expert, so there could very well be real laws out there that could allow this to happen. But I haven't come across them yet and asking for others to share if they know of any seems to be a logical thing to do.
But most people don't give a bee's burp for laws and just go on vibes and wishes and misunderstanding of laws. It basically boils down to everything being "But if you take X and Y and add blue and subtract Oreos, then it could happen!!!"
They just cobble together a bunch of random, unrelated concepts, throw in a lot of misunderstanding of laws, mix it up while clicking their heels three times and throwing salt over their shoulder and call that proof. 🤷♀️
Without regard to what the rest of your argument is - this particular line is something that everyone, self included, should always be working on, rather than emoting agreement or disagreement.