Did Rand Paul find a single line of text that doesn't line up 100 % with libertarians, or does he just want to cheat? I'm getting tired of "say no to everything" libertarians.
Trump understands that the path to the end goal of liberty requires less than perfect intermediary steps. Things like the Big Beautiful Bill that included many things we want, but also included some things we don't like, and costs too much. So they track these things down and accuse Trump of abandoning the cuase and being controlled by theDeepstate. ("See, told you so. You should have voted for DeSantis.") I feel that he knows this and will correct for those imperfections in later actions. We still have RINO's that we must sometimes work with. We can't just say no all the time.
I researched it, Rand WANTS fair elections, his worry is if we federalize elections and that power becomes centralized, if a democrat gains control they can say "no id required for all states" and since the federal government now can force wild rules for all states under Save Act, it is too risky.
I get understand his argument, but I don't think we will have a democratic party to compete with after 3 years.
Ultimately, such requirements need to be a constitutional amendment. It shouldn't be at the mercy of politics and is widely popular even among Democrats
To be honest, his point is historically moot anyways, Voting Rights Act of 1865 already interferes with elections in such a greivous way as to overshadow such a minor thing as voter ID.
Hell, the Reconstruction acts completely dissolved civilian government in the South unless they allowed blacks to vote. Surely Rand, Mr. Principled is going to advocate for the repealing the 14th amendment, since States should decide who can vote and who can't?
Libertarians generally want what conservatives want, but they generally seem to have no viable plan to get there because any path requires less than perfect intermediary steps, and libertarians can't go outside their "principles" even a little bit. So they just say no.
Agreed. But this is where someone with a big platform like Tucker or some other right wing journalist should be interviewing these guys to get them on record about what they are thinking. Make them say what’s going on and why they are betraying us
Are any of his constituents asking? They are the first that should be questioning his motives. I'd like to hear them speak up rather that give Tucker more clicks.
Well whatever it takes. I’m patiently waiting for some patriot to post an interview with Rand Paul here or anywhere. Where are the young guns on this? Chance to make your name
Did Rand Paul find a single line of text that doesn't line up 100 % with libertarians, or does he just want to cheat? I'm getting tired of "say no to everything" libertarians.
There is nothing libertarian about paul. Im a libertarian and i would bever vote for him. Trump is more libertarian than rand paul.
Trump understands that the path to the end goal of liberty requires less than perfect intermediary steps. Things like the Big Beautiful Bill that included many things we want, but also included some things we don't like, and costs too much. So they track these things down and accuse Trump of abandoning the cuase and being controlled by theDeepstate. ("See, told you so. You should have voted for DeSantis.") I feel that he knows this and will correct for those imperfections in later actions. We still have RINO's that we must sometimes work with. We can't just say no all the time.
I researched it, Rand WANTS fair elections, his worry is if we federalize elections and that power becomes centralized, if a democrat gains control they can say "no id required for all states" and since the federal government now can force wild rules for all states under Save Act, it is too risky.
I get understand his argument, but I don't think we will have a democratic party to compete with after 3 years.
Ultimately, such requirements need to be a constitutional amendment. It shouldn't be at the mercy of politics and is widely popular even among Democrats
To be honest, his point is historically moot anyways, Voting Rights Act of 1865 already interferes with elections in such a greivous way as to overshadow such a minor thing as voter ID.
Hell, the Reconstruction acts completely dissolved civilian government in the South unless they allowed blacks to vote. Surely Rand, Mr. Principled is going to advocate for the repealing the 14th amendment, since States should decide who can vote and who can't?
Libertarians generally want what conservatives want, but they generally seem to have no viable plan to get there because any path requires less than perfect intermediary steps, and libertarians can't go outside their "principles" even a little bit. So they just say no.
Agreed. But this is where someone with a big platform like Tucker or some other right wing journalist should be interviewing these guys to get them on record about what they are thinking. Make them say what’s going on and why they are betraying us
Are any of his constituents asking? They are the first that should be questioning his motives. I'd like to hear them speak up rather that give Tucker more clicks.
Well whatever it takes. I’m patiently waiting for some patriot to post an interview with Rand Paul here or anywhere. Where are the young guns on this? Chance to make your name