Like many anons I've been intrigued by Promethean Action. But something always feels a bit wrong. Like eating potato chips: it feels good in the moment but each one only makes you want more, and you're never really satisfied. It's always "not enough" up until it's "ugh, that's too much."
Maybe it's just me who feels that way, but I came across this historical dig and thought I'd share it. https://open.substack.com/pub/biggertruth/p/those-who-steal-fire-the-marxist
We're all familiar with the discussions about who ultimately controls the cabal: Vatican, the Jews, the Jesuits, the Rothchilds, Freemasons, Prussians and so on. The only thing I'm sure of is that the cabal hides in every group, and every group is subject to their infiltration, and that they are stateless, borderless, and evil. To me it seems that Promethean Action is not doing much except inserting themselves into that discussion by saying it's the Brits. While there are plenty of evil Brits on display in their government today, and even more in their shadowy intelligence agencies, I'm not convinced they're the top dogs or much more than any other European DS-captured puppet regime.
Either way, it's worth keeping an open mind and using discernment in the narrative war. They speak a lot of truth, but the potential for deflection is there.
Warning: the author of this blog distrusts Lt Gnl Michael Flynn. Regardless I think the P.A. background stands on its own.
"It's the Brits" ....
That alone says it. The premise Promethean Action espouses (based on Schiller Institute) = It's the City of London.
I would argue, it is not even the "CIty" that is just a location, jurisdiction. There is a Hybrid: EIC/ VOC that changed its stripes under the guise of two Royal Houses: Windsor and Orange. A deal was made in 1780/1815.
Once the focus of attention goes towards items as debt and financialization, the effect of maximizing profits and treating everything as chattel, it becomes quite clear what is going on, and why certain moves are made.
In relation to the substack, the premise on which it is written, is not even close to the target and intentionally wrong.
EIC = economic industrial complex? VOC = Dutch East India company?
Are the LaRouche-Marxist ties untrue? I'll look into it further. Thanks.
Nope, true .... however, that should not preclude them from concluding the obvious and acting accordingly. Some people simply go on a venture through all kinds of ideas.
EIC = East India Company ... = special purpose vehicle. -> morphes into something else.
EIC/VOC: think New Amsterdam/ New York: half free. => difference between a slave turned half free and a freeman? duty to pay taxes and the prospect of returning to slavery if duty is not performed.
In terms of the word slavery, as it existed in 1776, the book written by Reverend Richard Price offers some insights:
Point 4 is an aggregate from the first 3. He writes clearly that the absence of one of these 4 = slavery, not indentured servitude, or some other fancy name. No ... slavery. There is nothing in between.
Interestingly: this book was written in 1776 and published in the City of London, paid for by the commons and handed to Price by the Lord Mayor in a gold box.
Price, Richard-Reverend --Nature-of-Civil-Liberty-the-Principles-of-Govmnt-and-the-Justice-and-Policy-of-the-War-with-America--Ninth-Edition --12-1776-html
Thanks.