The Long History of Infowars Propaganda Against Q (Alex Jones, Jack Posobiec, and Jerome Corsi) - by Jordan Sather.
(jordansather.substack.com)
😵💫 Conspiracy Conspirators 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
Whole lotta fluffy to bypass cold logic ain't going to cut this mustard anon!
They went sideways in the 1990s and Bill Cooper let you know.
They went sideways in the 2020s and Q team let you know.
When you reconcile your cognative dissonance and are able to let go of your hero, [those you were taught to trust the most], let ME know!
So until he goes sideways he is "still briefing the Trump team"? How does that logic work? You have no evidence that he was ever briefing Trump team. No deltas no ask and ye shall receive no nothing! Nada. Not shit
Not a single solitary iota of any confirmation from Trump that AJ is briefing them or in any way working with them.
But we have direct posts from someone who is confirmed working with them. And those posts say AJ is a bad actor. So ok, plenty of people are focused on the things you said we should focus on. But thank God some of us are focused on cleaning our own house of the filthy subverters who are STILL active and trying to get in the mix. If AJ tried to subvert Bill Cooper in the 90s, and then Q team, what makes you think he won't jump at the first chance to subvert whatever is next in our fight to destroy the cabal? AJ is part of the cabal
I posted my reply, I chose to specifcally not engage with you with your up front mockery. I already said I understand all sides. All the sides have flaws, thats the point. You and I both, just let it go.
Respectfully, I wish you would engage. I'll hold off on the mockery, if you can walk me through the logic. I suspect you cannot, but I'm willing to find out?
u/#q1341
If anyone is going to ask me for a recommendation on good listens, he’s not on it. I just don’t see a need to sit in judgment.
“Move on.” is a very solid recommendation. There is no benefit to getting in the final “you’re good/bad”, when it seems like just looking for a better information source is better, with some obvious exceptions (CNN, NYT, WAPO, AP, REUTERS, etc) that should always be strongly discouraged.