A canary trap (redacting innocuous/unrelated names alongside sensitive ones) aids principled actors seeking genuine justice by:
deterring hasty overreach — Triggers when all redacted names are blanket-labeled as "incriminated elites," forcing corrections and damaging credibility of rushed claims.
Protecting innocents — Bundles unrelated civilians (e.g., photo lineup fillers) with real figures; outing them sparks backlash, shielding non-involved people from harm.
Promoting careful scrutiny — Reveals mixed redactions, pushing reviewers to verify context per name instead of assuming broad cover-ups.
Buying time for proper handling — Embarrassment slows aggressive unredaction demands, allowing methodical review (victim protections, legal checks).
Exposing unreliable actors — Highlights bad-faith grandstanding vs. good-faith diligence, helping focus efforts on verifiable wrongdoing.
Overall: Punishes spectacle, rewards precision, and advances accurate accountability with minimal collateral damage.
I dont think its to see who leaks classified info. Its to see what each one searched for. People tend to search for whatever they are most scared of, to see if it exists.
What if there are different telltale inaccuracies in the information available to different congresspeople. Such that if they leak the information they are wrong in a unique way?
Its too hard since you wont know what they are going to search. When you want to check for leaks you release a specific piece of information with variations and see which one spreads. When you want to find out what a person is interested in, you make available vast amount of data and see what they tune into.
I hope these four sue the pants off of this dweeb. Democrats... when they're not stepping on their own private parts they're stepping on someone else's private parts.
grok-- How a Canary Trap Benefits the 'Good Guys'
A canary trap (redacting innocuous/unrelated names alongside sensitive ones) aids principled actors seeking genuine justice by:
deterring hasty overreach — Triggers when all redacted names are blanket-labeled as "incriminated elites," forcing corrections and damaging credibility of rushed claims.
Protecting innocents — Bundles unrelated civilians (e.g., photo lineup fillers) with real figures; outing them sparks backlash, shielding non-involved people from harm.
Promoting careful scrutiny — Reveals mixed redactions, pushing reviewers to verify context per name instead of assuming broad cover-ups.
Buying time for proper handling — Embarrassment slows aggressive unredaction demands, allowing methodical review (victim protections, legal checks).
Exposing unreliable actors — Highlights bad-faith grandstanding vs. good-faith diligence, helping focus efforts on verifiable wrongdoing.
Overall: Punishes spectacle, rewards precision, and advances accurate accountability with minimal collateral damage.
That fits better than I thought!
thx. sometimes ai does do a good job ;)
It's not the tool, it's the one who uses it
yes
I dont think its to see who leaks classified info. Its to see what each one searched for. People tend to search for whatever they are most scared of, to see if it exists.
What if there are different telltale inaccuracies in the information available to different congresspeople. Such that if they leak the information they are wrong in a unique way?
Its too hard since you wont know what they are going to search. When you want to check for leaks you release a specific piece of information with variations and see which one spreads. When you want to find out what a person is interested in, you make available vast amount of data and see what they tune into.
With AI it cold be dynamic and realtime.
Where's the proof of this claim from Price?
Sauce dripping from the horse's mouth
(Yeah, sorry but not sorry for that image, kek)
I hope these four sue the pants off of this dweeb. Democrats... when they're not stepping on their own private parts they're stepping on someone else's private parts.
A Congress member is immune for what they say on the House floor.
I don't think that applies to defamation of a private citizen.
Think of how bad the defsmation/ slander could be from a perch like the house floor..
Tee He 😄 you said private parts..