Why do people focus so much in Israel and get so worked up about Trump saying stuff like "I'm a great supporter of Israel"?
Because even here, even with some posters like myself pointing it out repeatedly, most people either don’t understand, don’t want to understand, or deliberately pretend to not understand that there are many contexts that could be meant by the word “Israel”:
The modern country of Israel
The modern nation of political Israel
The modern government of the country of Israel
The biblical lineages of the tribes of Israel
The biblical lands of Israel
Those who contend with God
The Jews
A Rothschild-founded vassal proxy state
A major head of the global intel agencies
Maybe more
Every single Christian, imo, both is and should support #6, which also includes portions, but not entireties of the others.
In short, it is difficult to communicate a concept best represented by a Venn diagram of 7 different contexts containing unknown percentages of applicability with a single word. I would imagine Trump both needs to communicate things about aspects of it, and exploits that.
Well, it was a rhetorical question (kek) but in any case, you have answered it quite clearly and articulately here. Well done!
I think with certain sectors of our (wider) community, that thinking is there in the background, and so the 'nuances' are taken into account.
But sadly, a large part of the psywar waged for the past century has been to channel people into group-think, narrowness of vision, driven not by critical or clear thinking, but by other forces. So, there are many who brazenly ignore the nuances, some deliberately, because it serves their agenda, others through ignorance or a lack of awareness.
Would that this (the paradigm you articulate here) were front and center every time we (GAW) raise or discuss certain core ideas, like "Israel" but also "The Deep State", X country, X group, X players, and even Q.
Right now, I kinda like listening to Sapioplex and Jeff from the Pat and Jeff Show - in some moderation.
Not because I widely agree with them, though both intermittently say very insightful things (particularly Sapioplex), but because peppered generously between those things are totally nonsensical claims presented with absolutely zero evidence about things like “Zoids and their well-known behavioral tendencies” and “Abraham Lincoln’s real name was Ibrahim Kahloonie and he was an alien drooze from Iran and JFK’s great great uncle”. No statement of how they came to hold these crazy ideas (not crazy enough to be completely implausible these days, sadly), no evidence provided, just wild claims from 28 knots and a short taxi ride outside the left field bleachers.
For “Control your mind, Control your emotions.” they’re good practice.
That said, I may try to meme that Venn diagram for our less —NT— personalities.
Because even here, even with some posters like myself pointing it out repeatedly, most people either don’t understand, don’t want to understand, or deliberately pretend to not understand that there are many contexts that could be meant by the word “Israel”:
Every single Christian, imo, both is and should support #6, which also includes portions, but not entireties of the others.
In short, it is difficult to communicate a concept best represented by a Venn diagram of 7 different contexts containing unknown percentages of applicability with a single word. I would imagine Trump both needs to communicate things about aspects of it, and exploits that.
Well, it was a rhetorical question (kek) but in any case, you have answered it quite clearly and articulately here. Well done!
I think with certain sectors of our (wider) community, that thinking is there in the background, and so the 'nuances' are taken into account.
But sadly, a large part of the psywar waged for the past century has been to channel people into group-think, narrowness of vision, driven not by critical or clear thinking, but by other forces. So, there are many who brazenly ignore the nuances, some deliberately, because it serves their agenda, others through ignorance or a lack of awareness.
Would that this (the paradigm you articulate here) were front and center every time we (GAW) raise or discuss certain core ideas, like "Israel" but also "The Deep State", X country, X group, X players, and even Q.
Hmmm...
Right now, I kinda like listening to Sapioplex and Jeff from the Pat and Jeff Show - in some moderation.
Not because I widely agree with them, though both intermittently say very insightful things (particularly Sapioplex), but because peppered generously between those things are totally nonsensical claims presented with absolutely zero evidence about things like “Zoids and their well-known behavioral tendencies” and “Abraham Lincoln’s real name was Ibrahim Kahloonie and he was an alien drooze from Iran and JFK’s great great uncle”. No statement of how they came to hold these crazy ideas (not crazy enough to be completely implausible these days, sadly), no evidence provided, just wild claims from 28 knots and a short taxi ride outside the left field bleachers.
For “Control your mind, Control your emotions.” they’re good practice.
That said, I may try to meme that Venn diagram for our less —NT— personalities.
I had the same thought.