Was watching tommy Robinson on Tim cast and he pointed out that the rape gang problem in the UK is happening in other European nations that took in muslim immigrants and asylum seekers. he pointed out that for years England tried to hide the issue. So I decided to look for rape stats in Minneapolis and its surrounding suburbs. I discovered that the reported rape stats do not make any sense and that the one stat they are not tracking is religious affiliation of the attacker and the victim.. my research was just using the AI on grock so this is not conclusive but at this point I think that the state is covering up the rape of young non Muslim women by Muslims in the states
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
For the longest time I believed that the sentence for raping someone should be 10-20 years in prison. Now I'm slowly coming to the point that a bullet to the back of the head for these criminals will make two things happen. 1) fewer prisoners, which leads to lower incarceration costs, 2) a very good deterrent to help keep a rapist's junk in his pants.
I do wonder if the victim would feel relief if such a sentence was carried out. Could the victim have a normal life or would he/she be constantly repeating that scene in their mind for the rest of their lives?
Sounds good in theory. But there’d need to be guardrails in place to deal with the percentage of cases that ultimately will be simply lies, regretted one night stands, and or outright made up accusations.
Or else you risk summarily executing innocent people.
You are correct. Maybe a bullet for actual verifiable acts of malicious intent. I do understand about the scorned lover scenario, though. Guardrails are not a bad thing.
Ultimately, it should at least be on the table. In cases where there is no doubt (how that is defined, TBD), it absolutely should be there.