That is if his Justice Department would lock up the crooks in our government. The people would see that his administration would be seeking justice. And I think I agree with most of the people here-we need to have military tribunals-as the courts are corrupt. These people need to be punished and punished hard for their crimes. Many may have committed Treason against the United States. So I say either get the arrests made-Pam Bondi-or leave the administration of our great president's. What say you all? I don't have/know all the answers, but I believe this would help a lot! Or at least let the people know ARRESTS are coming (soon).
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (5)
sorted by:
In military legal proceedings, there is a "jury," though it is officially referred to as a panel and its members as members. These panels perform a role similar to a civilian jury by acting as the trier of fact to determine guilt or innocence. Wikipedia Wikipedia +3 Who Makes Up the Jury Pool? The jury pool is not drawn from the general public but exclusively from active-duty military personnel. The pool and selection process are defined by specific criteria: Legally Blonde AF Legally Blonde AF +3 Selection Authority: Unlike civilian juries selected at random, military panel members are handpicked by a convening authority, typically a high-ranking officer (such as a 2 or 3-star general). Selection Criteria: The convening authority must select members who are "best qualified" based on age, education, training, experience, length of service, and judicial temperament. Rank Requirements: All panel members must be senior in rank (or at least equal) to the accused. A lower-ranking service member cannot sit in judgment of a higher-ranking one. Officer vs. Enlisted: If the accused is an officer, the panel must consist entirely of officers. If the accused is enlisted, they have the right to request that at least one-third of the panel be composed of enlisted members. Otherwise, the panel may be all officers. Exclusions: Members cannot be in a training status, deployed, or from the same command if it might cause a conflict of interest, though they are generally stationed at the same installation where the trial occurs. Wikipedia Wikipedia +9 Key Differences from Civilian Juries Size: Military panels are typically smaller, often consisting of 4 members for special courts-martial and 8 for general courts-martial (12 for capital cases). Verdict: Except in cases where the death penalty is possible, a unanimous verdict is not required. Conviction usually requires a three-fourths majority. Questioning: Panel members are often permitted to ask questions of witnesses during the trial, subject to the judge's approval. Wikipedia Wikipedia +5 AI responses may include mistakes. For legal advice, consult a professional.
AI can sometime lead us in the wrong direction. Not because of the question, all the time, but because of what isn't asked. I thought that military tribunals should have to be used in cases of treason. Civilians are just that and need to be tried by civilian courts.