I don't know why Tucker would lie in this instance. Frankly, I don't care. What I do care about is investigations into Tucker.

I have really good reasons for Tucker as an agent of the C_A. Indeed, I'm in the range of 100% certain he is a C_A agent. Without any doubt his father was (self stated). Without any doubt he said he wanted to be. Without any doubt he moved to Virginia at the exact same time that he "failed" to become a C_A agent, and instead became an immediate, very high up agent for MSM, while at the same time his father became one of the most important people in the C_A's propaganda system (head of Voice of America).

There are numerous other pieces of corroborating evidence that suggest that Tucker was, and is Controlled Opposition, an asset of the C_A's Limited Hangout infrastructure.

Having said that, I think all of that infrastructure has been taken over by Q. Without a doubt it has been, but on what level? Who knows. What are Tucker's current motivations given that the control of the world's control mechanisms has changed hands and people have other options? Who knows.

The point is, there is no way to know where a person's allegiance lies. Nor does it really matter. What matters is that we shouldn't trust anyone. Listen to what a person has to say. If Loomer is giving evidence about Tucker's lies, we should listen.

Having said that, in this case, unfortunately I couldn't stand listening to her for more than a couple minutes. She was too full of disdain for my liking. I've read some other things she's written and liked some of what she had to say, but in general, I'm not her biggest fan.