Nancy Mace tried to force Congress to release its own sexual misconduct records today.
357 members voted to stop her.
(twitter.com)
🏛️ PANIC IN DC 🏛️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Anons shouldn't forget that we still have the Brunson Brothers case on the back burner.
It is the 'nuclear' option with regards to removing the Deep State assets in Congress. It effectively nullifies their office, as they have all violated their oaths of office.
Everyone crying "no arrests" need to understand. It isn't one of them. It isn't a few of them. It isn't even some of them. It is the vast majority of them. As Q told us; it had to be this way.
I believe the Save Act and the Mid Terms are the last effort of the White Hats to remove the Deep State through Civilian Law. After that, if the Deep State still wants to play ball, it will be Military Law they will have to content with should they try to disrupt or tamper with the elections this time.
Everything takes forever and I know.
Can you update on the status of the Brunson case? I thought SCOTUS denied cert and it was dead in the water.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Z9v9MYatJDe The Brunson Brothers case has ALREADY been the voted on by SCOTUS AND WON (a 5 to 4 vote)
chatGPT:
No — the claim that the “Brunson Brothers case has already been voted on by SCOTUS and won 5-to-4” is not true.
What’s documented in actual court records and credible reporting is this:
The lawsuit known as Brunson v. Adams et al. (filed by Raland J. Brunson and others) sought to challenge the 2020 presidential election results and remove President Biden and other federal officials from office based on allegations of oath-of-office violations. That case and related petitions were denied by the U.S. Supreme Court — meaning the Court refused to hear it rather than ruling on the merits. The denials were documented by multiple sources reporting on the Supreme Court’s orders declining to grant review. 
The Supreme Court did not conduct a full hearing, did not issue a 5–4 decision in favor of the Brunson brothers, and did not reinstate Donald Trump as president based on any such vote. The justices simply declined to grant certiorari (i.e., they chose not to review the case). 
Versions of the claim that SCOTUS “voted 5–4 and won” appear to come from unofficial forums, rumors, or fringe discussions — not from official Supreme Court records or reliable news reporting. 
If you want, I can point you to the official Supreme Court docket entries and explain how to interpret them.
Can you provide any source for that other than a bitchute video? When I look at the SCOTUS docket all I can see is that the SCOTUS declined to hear both of the Brunson cases on Feb 21, 2023 and July 22. 2024, respectively.